Diabetic Thyroid Cancer Health Risk Alert: Byetta Has Recently Been Linked To An Increased Risk of Thyroid Cancer By Diabetic Thyroid Cancer Lawyer

Diabetic Thyroid Cancer Health Risk Alert: Some Diabetes Drugs Have Recently Been Linked To An Increased Risk of Thyroid Cancer By Diabetic Thyroid Cancer Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

In 2012, more than 200,000 people were newly diagnosed with thyroid cancer.  A growing number of people with thyroid cancer are diabetics.  While some diabetic drugs are known to cause an increased risk of thyroid cancer and this increased risk is on the warning label, other diabetic drugs do not have warnings regarding an increased risk of thyroid cancer.  

The diabetes drug, Byetta, currently does not have a warning regarding an increased risk of thyroid cancer, however, some recent studies have suggested that the diabetes drug, Byetta, increases the risk of thyroid cancer.  As such, several Byetta Thyroid Cancer lawsuits are currently being reviewed that allege that the maker of Byetta has failed to provide adequate warnings to consumers and the medical community of this cancer risk resulting in serious injury and death from thyroid cancer.

Individuals that have been diagnosed with thyroid cancer and have taken Byetta as well as families that have lost a loved one to thyroid cancer and that loved one was taking Byetta may be entitled to financial compensation and are strongly encouraged to have their potential case reviewed.  For more information on Byetta Thyroid Cancer Lawsuits, please feel free to contact Byetta Thyroid Cancer Lawyer, Jason Coomer, or use our online submission form.

FDA Adverse Events Have Shown Byetta May Cause An Increased Risk of Thyroid Cancer and Pancreatic Cancer: Persons Taking Byetta That Have Been Diagnosed With Pancreatic Cancer or Thyroid Cancer as well as Their Doctors and Families Are Encouraged To Report Adverse Events To The FDA

 
In July 2011, researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles studied the connection between Byetta and pancreatic cancer, pancreatitis, and thyroid cancer by combing FDA adverse events reports. They calculated a sixfold increase in users developing pancreatitis, and Byetta increased the likelihood of pancreatic cancer by 2.9 times. The lead researcher, Dr. Peter Butler, cautioned that the results do not account for increased Byetta side effects reporting by doctors. The study appeared in the journal of Gastroenterology. 
 

In 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a Drug Safety Communication to announce that drug-makers Amylin Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly Co. must conduct 6 post-marketing surveillance studies to better understand the potential link between Byetta and thyroid cancer. The result of these studies are still pending.

Persons who are taking Byetta and who have been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer or thyroid cancer and their families are strongly encouraged to report adverse events to the FDA to ensure that all cancer risks are properly reviewed and placed on any future Byetta warnings.
 

Byetta Thyroid Cancer Alert: Recent Studies Have Connected Byetta To An Increased Risk of Thyroid Cancer by Byetta Thyroid Cancer Lawyer

Byetta Thyroid Cancer Alert and Byetta Pancreatic Cancer Alert: Recent Scientific Studies Have Connected Byetta To An Increased Risk of Thyroid Cancer and Pancreatic Cancer by Byetta Thyroid Cancer Lawyer and Byetta Pancreatic Cancer Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

Persons taking the injectable diabetes drug, Byetta (Exenatide), should be aware that this diabetes drug may cause an increased risk of thyroid cancer as well as pancreatic cancer.  It is important for any person taking the drug, Byetta, to communicate with their physician to determine the best course of treatment for their diabetes and to make sure that they are aware of any potential cancer symptoms if they continue to take the drug.

If you are taking Byetta and have been diagnosed with thyroid cancer or pancreatic cancer, please feel free to contact Byetta Thyroid Cancer Lawyer and Byetta Pancreatic Cancer Lawyer, Jason S. Coomer about a potential lawsuit. 

Byetta (Exenatide) Has Been Used By Millions of People 

Byetta was the first glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist to be approved by the FDA for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Byetta exhibits many of the same effects as the human incretin hormone GLP-1. GLP-1 improves blood sugar after food intake through multiple effects that work in concert on the stomach, liver, pancreas and brain.  Byetta was approved in the U.S. in April 2005 and in Europe in November 2006 and has been used by more than 1.8 million patients since its introduction. Nearly 7 million prescriptions for Byetta were dispensed between April 2005 and September 2008.  In 2010 Byetta sales were over $500 million.  

The Diabetes Drug Market is Over $40 Billion Each Year and Growing Rapidly Byetta had Annual Sale of Over $500 Million in 2010

More than 300 million people worldwide suffer from diabetes and this number is increasing each year.  This number includes about 26 million Americans who are diabetics.  The global market for products in the management of diabetes currently stands at $41 billion and is on pace to grow to over $114 billion by 2018.


With this huge market for diabetic drugs, many drug producers are pushing drugs with known dangers and are attempting to hide the potential dangers of their drugs to keep or obtain a higher market share.  As such, it is important that persons that have developed cancer from specific drugs or families that have lost loved ones from specific drugs step forward and report dangerous drugs to the FDA as well as file lawsuits to make selling dangerous less profitable.

For more information on potentially dangerous drugs, please go to the following web pages: Byetta Pancreatic Cancer Lawsuits and Byetta Thyroid Cancer Lawsuits and Diabetic Drug Pancreatic Cancer Lawsuits.

Report Hospital Billing Fraud and Collect Large Financial Rewards: Medical Professionals That Properly Report Hospital Billing Fraud Can Collect Large Financial Rewards By Hospital Billing Fraud Lawyer

Report Hospital Billing Fraud and Collect Large Financial Rewards: Medical Professionals That Properly Report Hospital Billing Fraud Can Collect Large Financial Rewards By Hospital Billing Fraud Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

Hospital billing fraud includes upcoding, false coding, false certifications, double billing, phantom patients, unbundling, and illegal kickbacks.  These forms of billing fraud are costing the government billions of dollars and can be the basis of qui tam whistleblower reward lawsuits that offer large financial rewards to medical professions including hospital administrators and other hospital employees that properly expose significant hospital billing fraud.   

For more information on properly reporting hospital billing fraud and having a potential hospital billing fraud case confidentially reviewed, please feel free to contact Hospital Billing Fraud Lawyer, Jason S. Coomer, via e-mail message or go to the following webpage: Report Hospital Billing Fraud and Whistleblower Reward Lawsuit.  

Being the First to File on a Hospital Billing Fraud Scheme is Essential for Recovery Under the False Claims Act

It is essential to not delay in coming forward with a Hospital Billing Fraud Qui Tam Whistleblower Action as the first whistleblower to file is eligible to be a relator and can make a large recovery for exposing the fraud.  Additionally, when the fraudulent scheme is exposed, the people that kept the fraud secret can sometimes be found liable for criminal activity for not exposing the fraud that was being committed.

Hospital Billing Fraud Whistleblower Lawsuits Include Upcoding Qui Tam Whistleblower Lawsuits and Coding Fraud Whistleblower Lawsuits

Upcoding occurs when a medical service provider intentionally and fraudulently upcodes services to obtain a higher reimbursement than one that is entitled to for the service that was actually provided.  In both the Medicare and Medicaid systems a set of billing codes is used by healthcare providers to bill for services. These codes are known as the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS). A service provider that intentionally uses a higher paying code to fraudulently reflect that a more expensive procedure or device was involved in the patient’s treatment than actually was used or was necessary.  A pattern of intentional upcoding treatment can result in large profits for the healthcare provider, but also cost taxpayers millions of dollars.

Upcoding fraud is typically hard to catch without the help of persons with inside information because that Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes are billed electronically and can easily slip through the system.  Therefore unless the upcoding is caught through a random audit (approximately 2% of the claims per year are audited), it is up to insiders, informants, heroes, and health care professionals to catch fraudulent upcoding.

Another type of coding fraud is “unbundling”, where bundled related procedures or composite lab tests are run together, but billed separately by the lab or healthcare provider to obtain more compensation.  These types of billing fraud also allow healthcare providers and labs to make higher profits by bilking Medicare, Medicaid, and taxpayers out of millions of dollars.  These unbundling fraud schemes are also hard to detect without someone that is familiar with the codes and billing.

Hospital Billing Fraud and Other Forms of Health Care Fraud Are Costing The United States and U.S. Taxpayers About $100 Billion Each Year

Law enforcement authorities estimate that health-care fraud costs taxpayers about $100 billion each year.  Through Health Care Fraud Qui Tam Lawsuits billions of dollars have been recovered from individuals and organizations that have committed health care fraud on the United States Government and State Governments. 

HEALTH CARE FRAUD CASE NETS RECOVERY OF $1.7 BILLION 

HCA Inc. (formerly known as Columbia/HCA and HCA - The Healthcare Company) and HCA subsidiaries agreed to pay the United States over $1.7 Billion including $631 million in 2003 for civil penalties and damages arising from false claims the government alleged it submitted to Medicare and other federal health programs. In 2000, HCA subsidiaries pled guilty to substantial criminal conduct and paid more than $840 million in criminal fines, civil restitution and penalties.  HCA will paid an additional $250 million to resolve overpayment claims arising from certain of its cost reporting practices.  In total, the government will have recovered $1.7 billion from HCA.

This Qui Tam settlement resolved fraud allegations against HCA and HCA hospitals in nine False Claims Act qui tam or whistleblower lawsuits pending in federal court in the District of Columbia. Under the federal False Claims Act, private individuals may file suit on behalf of the United States and, if the case is successful, may recover a share of the proceeds for their efforts. Under the HCA settlement, the whistleblowers will receive a combined share of $151,591,500.00.

http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2003/June/03_civ_386.htm

Report Hospice Fraud: Hospice Fraud Whistleblowers Are Needed To Report False Certifications and Other Hospice Fraud by Hospice Fraud Qui Tam Lawyer

Report Hospice Fraud: Hospice Fraud Whistleblowers Are Needed To Report False Certifications and Other Hospice Fraud by Hospice Fraud Qui Tam Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

Large financial rewards are being offered to hospice fraud whistleblowers that are the first to step forward to report large hospice care providers that are committing hospice fraud.  If you are aware of a large hospice care provider or other health care company that is committing hospice fraud, please feel free to contact Hospice Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer, Jason S. Coomer.

For more information on hospice fraud, please read below or go to the following web page: Report Hospice Fraud Information.

Large Hospice Providers in The Unites States Are Receiving Hundreds of Millions of Dollars in Government Benefits and Some Have Been Committing Hospice Fraud

Hospice fraud is on the rise as many large corporations have tried to increase their profits through false certifications, over billing, and other forms of hospice fraud.  Because Medicare, the health program for the elderly and the disabled, automatically pays the vast majority of the bills it receives from companies that possess federally issued supplier numbers, many large companies have learned that hospice fraud is lucrative and is often not detected.

However, there have been several large health care providers that have been made to pay large multimillion dollar fines for hospice fraud lawsuits.  These lawsuits include cases against Odyssey Healthcare Inc. and SouthernCare. There are several other hospice fraud lawsuits that are currently pending and large rewards are being offered to professionals, employees, and other whistleblowers that are the first to be able to expose large scale hospice fraud being committed by a large hospice provider.  Some of the largest hospice providers in the United States include: Vitas, Gentiva, HCR ManorCare, Amedisys, Aseracare, Hospice of the Valley, Compassionate Care Hospice, Seasons Hospice, Hospice Compassus, Southern Care, Providence, Harden Healthcare, Crossroads Hospice, American Hospice, Tidewell Hospice, Hospice of Palm Beach County, Suncoast Hospice, Community Hospice of Northeast, Hope Hospice; Community Services, and Hospice of the Western Reserve.

Hospice Fraud Can Occur When A Hospice Care Provider Falsely Certifies or Recertifies Patients That Are Not Eligible For Hospice Benefits

Hospice Care Providers that practice a pattern of enrolling and recertifying non-terminal patients and billing for continuous care that isn't necessary or reasonable can be committing Hospice Medicare Fraud.  Other Hospice Care Providers that fraudulently maximize the use of Medicare’s hospice benefit by pressuring its employees to enroll people into hospice who aren’t dying and resist discharging them despite evidence they weren’t deteriorating can also be committing Hospice Medicare Fraud that can be the also be the basis of a Hospice Federal False Claims Act Whistleblower Reward Lawsuit.  These Hospice Medicare Fraud Schemes typically have a large health care and hospice provider recruite patients eligible for skilled nursing care for 20 days, for which Medicare pays the entire bill. After the 20 days, when Medicare requires patients pick up a part of the tab, the health care and hospice provider will send the patients to hospice to collect a flat payment from Medicare for each day they are enrolled.  In these fraudulent arrangements a patient will typically be referred and re-referred until that patient has received—and Medicare has been billed for—the maximum number of days of skilled nursing care, including rehabilitative therapy, home health care, and hospice care. 

By being the first to expose a hospice Medicare fraud scheme, a hospice Medicare fraud whistleblower can receive a substantial reward for properly blowing the whistle on fraudulent hospice care providers. 

Hospice Fraud Whistleblowers Can Include Doctors, Nurses, Hospice Employees, or Anyone With Original Knowledge of Hospice Fraud

Hospice fraud whistleblowers are needed to step forward and blow the whistle on large hospice care providers that are committing hospice fraud.  If you are aware of a large hospice care provider or other health care company that is commiting hospice fraud, please feel free to contact Hospice Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer, Jason S. Coomer.  

Texas Animal Attack Lawyer and Texas Child Dog Bite Lawyer: Uncontrolled Vicious Dogs and Dangerous Animals Can Seriously Injure and Kill Children, Women, and Elderly Persons by Texas Fatal Animal Attack Lawyer and Texas Child Dog Bite Lawyer

Texas Fatal Animal Attack Lawyer and Texas Child Dog Bite Lawyer: Vicious Dog and Dangerous Animal Attacks Can Result When Careless Owners Fail to Protect Neighbors, Children, and Invitees from Being Attacked From Dangerous Animals by Texas Fatal Animal Attack Lawyer and Texas Child Dog Bite Lawyer

Vicious dogs and dangerous animals can cause serious injuries or even death when not properly restrained.  Property owners that keep dangerous animals and fail to properly restrain their animals can often be help liable when their animal attacks and seriously injures or kills a neighbor, invitee, or child.

It is estimated that there are over 4 million dog attacks each year.  Of these animal attacks, some of them are vicious animal attacks that kill or seriously injure children or groups of dangerous animals that hunt or attack an adult or elderly person.  These attacks can leave a child or adult permanently scarred and injured for life or result in death.  Though children and elderly people are typically the most vulnerable to attacks by vicious dogs, multiple dogs or unexpected attacks can injure anyone and cause serious injury or death.

Though dogs are the most common animal that attacks and causes serious injuries, other animals can also attack causing serious injuries or death.  Owners of these potentially dangerous or deadly animals are required to take reasonable care of their animals to make sure that they are not able to get free to attack neighbors or attack invited visitors.  When a landowner is careless and allows an animal to attack someone and should have been aware of the potential danger of their animal, the owner can often be held liable for the attack and any serious injuries or fatal injuries that the animal attack caused.

For more information on this topic, please read below or follow the below links:  Texas Animal Attack Death Lawyer and Texas Dog Bite Lawyer or Austin Texas Fatal Animal Attack Lawyer and Austin Texas Child Dog Bite Lawyer.

 

Austin Texas Dog Bite Lawsuits, Austin Dog Attack Lawsuits, and Austin Animal Attack Lawsuits

Unfortunately, some people fail to train or keep control of their animals.  Even worse some people train their Pit Bulls, Chows, Rottweilers, and other dangerous or vicious dogs to be attack dogs.  When these untrained and attack dogs attacks a child or neighbor, the injuries can be severe or deadly. 

The City of Austin has special laws in place that require owners of dogs to keep the dogs leased, unless the dog is in a specially designated area.  If the owner fails to keep track of their dog and that dog attacks someone, the own can often be found liable for the injuries that the dog causes.

In being an Austin Texas Dog Attack Injury attorney, I have been fortunate enough to represent some really good people that had been injured by dog attacks.  Helping these people obtain compensation for significant medical expenses, impairment, disfigurement, pain & suffering, and future medical, is a big part of being a lawyer and helping people recover from a vicious attack.

As an Austin Personal Injury Lawyer, Jason Coomer has worked on a wide variety of cases including several wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases.  He commonly works with other excellent lawyers including Dallas Personal Injury Lawyers, Houston Animal Attack Lawyers, San Antonio Dog Attack Lawyers, and Austin Canine Attack Lawyers.  Assembling litigation teams of Texas Wrongful Death and Personal Injury Lawyers for the larger cases and building multimedia presentations for mediation, arbitration, hearings, and trial can be time consuming, but when you are dealing with someone's life and the devastation that can be caused by a serious injury, a vicious animal attack, or loss of a loved one, the effort is worth it.  Individualized attention to a Texas Animal Attack Claim is extremely important.  Make sure that you have a Texas Dog Attack Attorney that knows your name and is familiar with your death claim or personal injury claims as well as your wants and needs.

If you have been seriously injured or have lost a loved one through the wrongful actions of a land owner with vicious dogs or other dangerous animals, please feel free to contact Austin Dog Bite Lawyer, Jason Coomer, with your name, date of accident, location of accident, nature of the injuries or loss, and name of the potential defendant for a free review of your potential claim.
 

Texas Family Business Inheritance Lawyer: Texas Family Business Inheritance Can Often Be Lost Through Improper Estate Planning and The Probate Process by Texas Family Business Inheritance Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

Texas Family Business Inheritance Lawyer and Texas Real Estate Inheritance Lawyer: Texas Family Business Inheritance and Texas Real Property Inheritance Can Often Be Lost Through Improper Estate Planning, Lack of Communication, Lack of Resources, and Failure To Understand The Texas Probate Legal System by Texas Family Business Inheritance Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

Some Texas families have been able to build successful businesses, obtain large real estate holdings including mineral interests, and accumulate significant wealth.  However, many of these wealthy Texas families will lose this wealth through inaction, failure to communicate essential business information, and failure to understand Texas probate and inheritance issues.  

As a Texas Family Business Inheritance Lawyer and Texas Real Estate Inheritance Lawyer, Jason Coomer works with family members throughout the World to protect, claim, and transfer wealth including family businesses, family farms, and family mineral interests.  For questions regarding Texas probate and inheritance law, protecting family businesses or property through probate, claiming family wealth, and clearing title to real estate after a death, please feel free to send an e-mail message to Texas Family Business Inheritance Lawyer Jason S. Coomer or use our contact form to submit an inquiry regarding a Texas Real Estate Inheritance or Texas Family Business Inheritance Matter. 

Many Situations Can Cause Texas Inherited Real Property and Texas Family Business Inheritance To Become Trapped After The Death of a Family Member: Failure To Clear Title To Texas Inherited Real Property and Texas Family Businesses Can Result In The Loss Of Family Wealth

 

After a family member dies, their real property or business can become stuck in the inheritance process and if proper action is not taken it can be lost to foreclosure, taxes, competitors, non-family members, or the State of Texas .  These situations are especially common when the person dies without a Will, leaves no instructions as to what they want done with their possessions after they die, and/or has no accurate inventory or accounting of their wealth.  In these situations, Texas real property and Texas businesses will need to be transferred under Texas intestate law.  As such, it is important to understand what Texas intestate law says on how the estate should be divided and how title to the real estate and ownership of the business can be transferred.

In addition to the issue of intestate succession, there are also a number of other common situations that can cause inherited real property and businesses to become stuck.  The first situation occurs when the family is unable to move forward with the probate process because of lack of resources.  The second situation occurs when the family is unable to move forward with probate because of proximity issues.  In other words, the heirs do not live in Texas or close to where their loved one died.  In a third situation, family members can start fighting over their loved one's estate.  In a forth situation, there is not sufficient information to know the amount of or location of wealth that needs to be transferred.  In other words, the family member that died or become incompetent did not do sufficient estate planning or communicate with their family members regarding their wealth.   In all these situations, Texas real estate and businesses can become stuck for years or can even be lost.

 

Clearing Title To and Transferring Texas Real Property and Texas Businesses Through Probate Usually Requires The Services of One or More Texas Family Business Inheritance Lawyers

Depending on the reason that caused Texas inherited property or a family business to become stuck in the probate process, the solution may be hiring a Texas family business inheritance lawyer or a Texas real estate inheritance lawyer.  In the situation where the surviving family cannot afford the probate process, a Texas real estate inheritance lawyer or Texas family business inheritance lawyer can sometimes work out a contingent contract or a hybrid contract where the lawyer will work to clear title to the Texas real property or family business so it can be sold or mortgaged allowing the heirs, beneficiaries, court costs, attorney's fees, and other expenses to be paid out of the sales proceeds of the real property or business.  In these situations, families can often prevent losing inherited wealth through foreclosure or taxes.

 

In the situation where the family lives outside of the State of Texas, a Texas real estate inheritance attorney can often be appointed the local agent for the administrator or executive and help with many of the tasks that need to be handled in administering the estate.  This can greatly limit the need for the family to make numerous trips to Texas or the county where their loved one died and allow a busy family member to handle probate issues without a significant drain on their time.

 

In situations where the heirs and beneficiaries start fighting, it is often necessary for multiple Texas real estate inheritance lawyers to become involved.  In these situations, it is typically best for each side to have their own legal counsel to advise them as to their rights under Texas law and if necessary to have legal counsel that can advocate for their rights.  These contested probate lawsuits can be expensive, but can be necessary when someone is attempting to steal family inheritance or the family needs experienced legal help to settle a disputed probate matter and prevent the loss of inherited real estate in Texas. 

 

Texas Family Business Inheritance Lawyer and Texas Real Estate Inheritance Lawyer

 

For more information regarding Texas probate and inheritance law, claiming family wealth, and clearing title to real estate after the death of a family member, please feel free to send an e-mail message to Texas Family Business Inheritance Lawyer Jason S. Coomer or use our contact form to submit an inquiry regarding a Texas Real Estate Inheritance or Texas Family Business Inheritance Matter. 

 

Rewards for Exposing False Books and Accounting Records: Ex-JPMorgan Chase Employees Charged Over 'London Whale' Scandal

SEC Bounty Action Whistleblowers Can Receive Large Rewards for Exposing False Books and Records, Wire Fraud, and False Regulatory Filings

Persons with evidence of false accounting records, securities fraud, insider trading, false information on SEC filings, insider trading; stock manipulation schemes, embezzlement by stockbrokers, or other securities fraud schemes, should contact a SEC Whistleblower lawyer to have their potential Bounty Action confidentially reviewed.

SEC Bounty Action Whistleblowers can work through a SEC Whistleblower Reward Lawyer to have a potential bounty action confidentially reviewed prior to exposing their identity.  This protection of a whistleblower's identity combined with large potential rewards that a whistleblower may receive for properly exposing SEC violations are intended to encourage high end financial professionals and investors to step forward and expose significant securities and investment fraud schemes.
   
Ex-JPMorgan Chase Employees Charged Over 'London Whale' Scandal

U.S. prosecutors have charged two former JPMorgan Chase employees, Javier Martin-Artajo and Julien Grout, for their role in the "London Whale" scandal.

The charges are a milestone in the government's response to what has been an embarrassing and costly episode for the biggest U.S. bank, which still faces the prospect of civil penalties. But it once again places the heaviest legal burden on players fairly low in the bank's hierarchy.

In criminal complaints unsealed on Wednesday morning, the Federal Bureau of Investigation accused Martin-Artajo and Grout of falsifying books and records, wire fraud and falsifying regulatory filings about bad trades in credit derivatives last year that cost JPMorgan more than $6.2 billion in losses. The FBI said it wants to arrest both men, who were also charged with conspiracy. Arrests could be challenging, as both are in Europe and out of the reach of U.S. law enforcement at the moment.

Separately, the Justice Department said another former JPMorgan employee, Bruno Iksil, known as the London Whale, had entered a "non-prosecution cooperation agreement." The government agreed not to prosecute Iksil as long as he cooperates and testifies truthfully about the trades and the alleged cover-up. Iksil has been helping the government build its case against other former JPMorgan employees, the Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday.

SEC Fraud Whistleblower Bounty Actions Are Designed to Expose Significant SEC Violations and Provide Large Financial Rewards For People That Are The Original Source of Information That Expose The Fraud Against The SEC

SEC Fraud Whistleblower Lawsuits or SEC Bounty Actions are a product of the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.  These laws were designed to create bounties that can be collected by whistleblowers that properly report SEC violations, financial fraud, securities fraud, commodities fraud, and stimulus fraud that result in monetary sanctions over one million dollars ($1,000,000.00).  The SEC can award the whistleblower up to 30% of the money collected.

By creating whistleblower bounties for investors and people with specific information of fraud, it is expected that hard to detect fraud will be exposed to help regulate the financial market and prevent large investment corporations, banks, hedge funds, and other large corporations from committing financial fraud of billions of dollars.

For more information on this topic, please go to the following web page: SEC Whistleblowers Receive Rewards for Exposing False Books and Accounting Records.

Texas Drunk Driver Crash Lawyer: Facts About Intoxicated Drivers and Texas Drunk Driver Crash Lawsuits by Texas Drunk Driver Crash Lawyer Jason Coomer

Texas Drunk Driver Crash Lawyer: Facts About Intoxicated Drivers and Texas Drunk Driver Crash Lawsuits by Texas Drunk Driver Crash Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

Alcohol is the number one killer on our roads and the most abused substance in the United States.
About three in every ten Americans will be involved in an alcohol-related vehicle collision at some point in their lives.  In 2009, there were 33,808 traffic fatalities in the United States, and the state of Texas accounted for 3,071 of those. In this same year, alcohol-impaired driving was a factor in 32% of the fatalities in the United States, and 45% of alcohol-related fatalities in Texas.  At any given time it is estimated that on the road, one out of every 100 drivers has a BAC of .10% or more.  Further, on Holidays, weekends, bar closing times, and during many special events this number increases dramatically.

One reason for the large number of drunk drivers on Texas roads are bars, night clubs, party hosts, fraternities, and restaurants that serve alcohol to customers that are already drunk.  Under Texas law a bar, night club, or restaurant that serves a drunk person alcohol can be held liable if they let that intoxicated person drive and the intoxicated person causes an automobile accident.  For more information on Texas Drunk Driver Crash Lawsuits, please read below or go to the following web pages: Texas Happy Hour Crash Lawsuits, Texas Fatal Drunk Driver Lawsuits, and Texas DWI Crash Lawsuits.

Texas Bar Drunk Driver Crash Lawsuits, Texas Happy Hour Lawsuits, Texas Drink Special Lawsuits, and other Texas Dram Shop Lawsuits

A Texas Dram Shop Lawsuit refers to Texas Bar Lawsuits, Texas Happy Hour Lawsuits, and Texas Drink Special Lawsuits where a bar, restaurant, or nightclub over serves drunk customers.  These lawsuits are against the bar, restaurant, or nightclub that violated Texas law.  More specifically, a dram shop is any drinking establishment where alcoholic beverages are sold including bars, restaurants, and nightclubs.  The term "dram shop" relates back to a time when a drinking establishment served patrons alcohol by the measurement of a dram which is one eighth of a fluid ounce.

The Texas Dram Shop Law was passed in 1987. This law allows individuals to bring civil lawsuits against a person or business who serves, sells, or provides alcohol to someone who is visibly intoxicated to the extent that he presents a clear and obvious danger to himself or others. In these Texas Bar Drunk Lawsuits the injured person or family of the person who was killed by a drunk driver need to prove where the drunk driver was drinking, the drunk driver caused the accident, that the intoxicated person was served after they were obviously intoxicated, and the intoxication was the proximate cause of the damage incurred.

In September 2004, the Texas Supreme Court clarified the law surrounding the responsibility between patrons and drinking establishments when they held in the Duenez decision that a licensed alcohol seller is jointly responsible with its patron when it provides alcohol to an obviously intoxicated patron and that patron harms another.

Texas Bar Drunk Driver Crash Lawsuits, Texas Happy Hour Lawsuits, Texas Drink Special Lawsuits, and other Texas Dram Shop Lawsuits

If you have lost a loved one in a drunk driver crash and that drunk driver was drinking and over served at a bar, nightclub, or restaurant, please feel free to submit an inquiry to Texas Bar Drunk Driver Crash Lawsuit Lawyer Jason Coomer for a Free Online Evaluation of your potential claim.

Texas Fatal Boat Accidents Can Occur When Drunk and Inexperienced People Operate Water Craft on Texas Lakes By Austin Texas Fatal Boat Accident Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

Texas Fatal Boat Accidents Can Occur When Drunk, Intoxicated, and Inexperienced People Operate Water Craft on Texas Lakes and Waterways By Austin Texas Fatal Boat Accident Lawyer Jason S. Coomer 

Every year negligent, careless, and drunk boat & water craft operators cause boating accidents that kill and seriously injure a large number of Texans.  In many of these boating accidents, alcohol, drugs, and untrained boat operators are the cause of the boating accidents.  A main cause of these Texas fatal boating accidents is that marinas, boat rental companies, and boat owners fail to warn inexperienced and untrained boat operators about the dangers of operating water craft while under the influence of drugs or alcohol.  In fact, some of these marinas, boat rental companies, and boat owners sell or give alcohol or drugs to inexperienced boat operators.

Under Texas law, it is illegal for drunk persons to operate motor vehicles, water craft, and air craft.  Further, if a drunk person causes an automobile accident or boating accident that causes serious injuries or death, they can be charged under Texas law with intoxication assault or intoxication manslaughter both serious felonies.  A person is considered drunk or under the influence if they do not have the normal use of mental or physical faculties by reason of the introduction of alcohol, a controlled substance, a drug, a dangerous drug, a combination of two or more of those substances, or any other substance into the body or if they have a blood alcohol concentration of over .08.

It is also possible under Texas law to hold boat owners, marinas, and boat rental companies accountable if they give a drunk boater a boat to use and that drunk boat operator causes a fatal boating accident.  These fatal boating accidents are all too common in many lakes throughout Texas including Lake Travis, Lake Austin, Lake LBJ, Lake Buchanan, Canyon Lake, Lake Conroe, Inks Lake, Town Lake, Medina Lake, and Granger Lake.

For more information on Texas Fatal Boat Accident Lawsuits, please feel free to contact Texas fatal boat accident lawyer Jason S. Coomer or go to the following web page: Texas Boat Accident Lawyer and Texas Boat Rental Accident Lawyer

SEC Bounty Actions and Confidential Reviews: New SEC Bounty Action Laws Help Protect The Identity of SEC Whistleblowers by SEC Bounty Action Whistleblower Reward Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

SEC Bounty Actions and Confidential Reviews by SEC Bounty Action Whistleblower Reward Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

SEC Bounty Action Whistleblowers can work through a lawyer to have a potential bounty action confidentially reviewed prior to exposing their identity.  This protection of a whistleblower's identity combined with large potential rewards that a whistleblower may receive for properly exposing SEC violations are intended to encourage high end financial professionals and investors to step forward and expose significant securities and investment fraud schemes.

Persons with evidence of  securities fraud, insider trading, false information on SEC filings, insider trading; stock manipulation schemes, embezzlement by stockbrokers, or other securities fraud schemes, should contact a SEC Whistleblower lawyer to confidentially review their potential case.

SEC Fraud Whistleblower Bounty Actions Are Designed to Expose Significant SEC Violations and Provide Large Financial Rewards For People That Are The Original Source of Information That Expose The Fraud Against The SEC

SEC Fraud Whistleblower Lawsuits or SEC Bounty Actions are a product of the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.  These laws were designed to create bounties that can be collected by whistleblowers that properly report SEC violations, financial fraud, securities fraud, commodities fraud, and stimulus fraud that result in monetary sanctions over one million dollars ($1,000,000.00).  The SEC can award the whistleblower up to 30% of the money collected.

By creating whistleblower bounties for investors and people with specific information of fraud, it is expected that hard to detect fraud will be exposed to help regulate the financial market and prevent large investment corporations, banks, hedge funds, and other large corporations from committing financial fraud of billions of dollars.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and SEC Whistleblower Incentive Program

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (frequently abbreviated SEC) is a federal agency which holds primary responsibility for enforcing the federal securities laws and regulating the securities industry, the nation's stock and options exchanges, and other electronic securities markets in the United States. The mission of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is to protect investors, maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitate capital formation.

In July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was signed into law which includes significant new financial fraud bounty whistleblower provisions.  These provisions create economic incentives for SEC violation whistleblowers and other financial fraud whistleblowers with "original information" of SEC violations and financial fraud to blow the on large scale financial fraud and SEC violations.

These SEC bounty claims must be brought voluntarily under the SEC Bounty Programs by one or more individuals.  The whistleblower or whistleblowers must be a natural person or natural persons, companies or other entity is not eligible to be financial fraud bounty whistleblowers.  Successful SEC violation bounty whistleblowers and financial fraud whistleblowers can collect financial rewards for whistleblower bounty actions that result in the imposition of monetary sanctions of greater than $1 million dollars.  This new financial fraud SEC bounty program is called the "Securities Whistleblower Incentives and Protection".

Through SEC Whistleblower Bounty Actions the SEC will award between ten percent and thirty percent of the money collected to a qualified whistleblower who voluntarily provides the SEC with original information about a violation of the securities laws that leads to a successful enforcement of an action brought by the SEC that results in monetary sanctions exceeding $1,000,000.00. 

So long as the financial fraud whistleblower or financial fraud whistleblowers base their claims on "original information", any person (not just an employee or insider) may file a SEC financial fraud bounty claim.  Further, if the financial fraud whistleblower is represented by an attorney, the whistleblower may file the financial fraud bounty claim anonymously.  However, before the financial fraud bounty award is paid, the whistleblower's identity shall be revealed to the SEC and SEC shall be provided information about the whistleblower that it requests.