Probe launched into pill makers' practices|Prime|chinadaily.com.cn
Authorities are suspending sales of 13 types of capsules with  reported chromium contamination and are checking the factories accused  of producing them.The State Food and Drug Administration issued an urgent notice on Sunday to suspend sales until safety is tested.
Description
The Texas Lawyers Blog provides useful information on the law and Texas lawyers. For more information on this Blog or a legal topic, please feel free to submit an inquiry or send an e-mail message to blog@texaslawyers.com
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Corporate Espionage and Fierce Competition Can Lead to Texas Patent Infringement Lawsuits, Texas Theft of Trade Secret Lawsuits, Texas Intellectual Property Infringement Lawsuits, & Texas Business Litigation Lawsuits by Texas Patent Infringement Lawyer, Texas Business Litigation Lawyer, Texas Trade Secret Theft Lawyer, and Texas Intellectual Property Infringement Lawyer Jason S. Coomer
       
     Corporate Espionage and Fierce Competition Can Lead to Texas Patent Infringement Lawsuits, Texas Theft of Trade Secret 
     Lawsuits, Texas Intellectual Property Infringement 
     Lawsuits, & Texas Business Litigation Lawsuits by Texas Patent Infringement Lawyer, Texas Business Litigation Lawyer, Texas Trade Secret Theft Lawyer, 
     and Texas Intellectual Property Infringement Lawyer Jason S. 
     Coomer  
Industrial 
     espionage including theft of trade secrets, patent 
     infringement, and illegal use of other intellectual 
     property is accelerating.   As patents, trade secrets, 
     and other intellectual property are key to competing in the competitive 
     business environment and are often developed through 
     expensive research, more and more businesses are becoming 
     targets for corporate espionage from domestic and 
     international competition.  
US Technologies and Trade Secrets at Risk in Cyberspace
Foreign Spies Stealing US Economic Secrets in Cyberspace
The pace of foreign economic collection 
     and industrial espionage activities against major US 
     corporations and US Government agencies is accelerating. FIS, 
     corporations, and private individuals increased their 
     efforts in 2009-2011 to steal proprietary technologies, 
     which cost millions of dollars to develop and represented 
     tens or hundreds of millions of dollars in potential 
     profits. The computer networks of a broad array of US 
     Government agencies, private companies, universities, and 
     other institutions—all holding large volumes of sensitive 
     economic information—were targeted by cyber espionage; much 
     of this activity appears to have originated in China.
Foreign collectors commonly take 
     advantage of the cyber environment because it is difficult 
     to detect and to attribute responsibility for these 
     operations.  
Traditionally, most patent infringement and corporate espionage has been limited to domestic lawsuits and enforcement.  However as many countries including China, India, Mexico, Russia, Brazil, and other emerging countries are importing more products back into the United States, new potential causes of actions and increased government enforcement are becoming available. China is the number 
     one source of infringing products seized at the U S border 
     and multinational corporations that use infringing products that are imported into the United States are a major focus of increased lawsuits and enforcement actions.  
Texas Patent Infringement Lawsuits, Texas Theft of Trade Secret 
     Lawsuits, Texas Intellectual Property Infringement 
     Lawsuits, & Texas Business Litigation Lawsuits
After a
 valuable 
     patent or other valuable intellectual property is infringed 
     upon or a trade secret is stolen, it is difficult to determine the 
next step.  Many questions arise and need to be answered including: 1) 
Who is infringing on our patent? 2) Is the infringement actionable? 3) 
Where is the infringement occurring? 4) When did the infringement begin?
 5) How do we stop the infringement? 6) What damages did we suffer?  7) 
What potential causes of action do we have? 8) Who are the defendants? 
and 9) Can we collect a judgment against this defendant or defendants? 
  
The answers to most of 
these questions can be complicated and very different depending on your 
business and the unique fact scenario surrounding the theft or 
infringement on your intellectual property.  By understanding what laws 
may apply to a particular patent infringement or theft of trade secret 
case, a business can determine how to respond including seeking 
compensation and protecting itself from future losses.
International Patent Infringement Lawyers, 
     International Trade Secret Theft Lawyers, International 
     Business Litigation Lawyers, International Intellectual 
     Property Theft Lawyers, International Fake Product Lawyers, 
     International Corporate Espionage Lawyers, International 
     Business Fraud Whistleblower Lawyers, International 
     Intellectual Property Lawyers,  and 
     International Business Litigation Teams
Large international patent infringement 
     lawsuits and international corporate espionage lawsuits usually require large litigation teams with business litigation lawyers throughout the United States and 
     the World.  These cases can be extremely complicated and require vast resources to fully litigated.   For more 
     information on this topic as well as some of the legal 
     issues and potential causes of action regarding 
     international patent infringement, international corporate 
     espionage, and international theft of trade secrets, please 
     go to the following web page:
     
     International Patent Infringement Lawsuits, International 
     Trade Secret Theft Lawsuits, International Supply Chain 
     Procurement Fraud Whistleblower Lawsuits, International 
     Patent Infringement Qui Tam Lawsuits, and International 
     Business Litigation Lawsuits. 
Patents & Texas Patent Infringement Lawsuits
A patent is the right to exclude others 
     from making, using, selling, or offering for sale a patented 
     invention.  The owner of a patent has several 
     exclusive rights to the patent. A violation of the patent 
     owner's exclusive rights constitutes an infringement 
     entitling the owner to injunctive relief to stop the 
     infringement and to monetary damages. Damages for patent 
     infringement can be based on lost profits or reasonable 
     royalties.  Lost profits are calculated on what the 
     plaintiff would have sold the device itself if the 
     infringement had not occurred.  While reasonable royalties 
     is determined by the amount the defendant would have paid 
     plaintiff as a royalty for the right to use the patents.
     Texas Theft of Trade Secrets Lawsuits and Texas Breach of Fiduciary Duty Lawsuits 
Officers and employees that wrongfully 
     steal intellectual property including theft of trade secrets, 
     customer lists, patents, and copyrights can be held liable 
     by Texas courts for breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, 
     fraud, and other business torts.  As the intellectual 
     property owned by a business becomes more valuable and 
     easier to steal through technology, it is increasingly 
     important for businesses to protect their intellectual 
     property as well as to make an example of officers, business 
     partners, independent contractors, and employees that steal 
     intellectual property.  
Texas Patent Infringement Lawsuits, Texas Theft of Trade Secret 
     Lawsuits, Texas Intellectual Property Infringement 
     Lawsuits, & Texas Business Litigation Lawsuits 
 For more information on Texas Patent Infringement Lawsuits, Texas Theft of Trade Secret 
     Lawsuits, Texas Intellectual Property Infringement 
     Lawsuits, & Texas Business Litigation Lawsuits, please feel free to go to the following webpage: Texas Patent Infringement Lawsuits, Texas Theft of Trade Secret      Lawsuits, Texas Intellectual Property Infringement      Lawsuits, & Texas Business Litigation Lawsuits. 
Friday, April 13, 2012
Fake Military Electronic Components, Low Quality Electronic Parts, and Defective Electronic Components Used by Military Defense Contractors in Building War Planes, Missile Defense Systems, Military Equipment, and other Military Supplies Can Cause Failure of Military Weapons and Military Equipment as well as be the Basis for Military Procurement Fraud Whistleblower Reward Lawsuits and FCPA Whistleblower Lawsuits by Military Contractor Fake Electronic Component Procurement Fraud Lawyer, False Certification Fraud Whistleblower Reward Lawyer, and Military Electronic Part Supply Chain Fraud Lawyer Jason Coomer
Fake Military Electronic Components, Low Quality Electronic 
      Parts, and Defective Electronic Components Used by Military Defense Contractors 
      in Building War Planes, Missile Defense Systems, 
      Military Equipment, and other Military Supplies Can 
      Cause Failure of Military Weapons and Military Equipment as well as be the Basis for 
      Military Procurement Fraud Whistleblower Reward 
      Lawsuits and FCPA Whistleblower Lawsuits by Military Contractor 
      Fake Electronic Component Procurement Fraud Lawyer, False Certification Fraud Whistleblower Reward Lawyer, and 
      Military Electronic Part Supply Chain Fraud Lawyer Jason Coomer
Fake electronic parts and other manufactured components and ingredients from China, Mexico, India, and other emerging countries are becoming a problem for the United States military, military contractors, health care providers, and government contractors that sell and certify products to the United States or other government entities.  By using cheaper electronic parts from 
       China, India, Mexico, and other countries to fulfill 
       government contracts, the military contractors are able to make larger profits, but can often be given fake electronic components or substandard electronic components.  As a result these 
       military contractors use defective military 
       electronic components, defective military electronic 
       parts, and defective military equipment parts in war 
       planes, missile systems, and other military 
       equipment.  Failure of these electronic components can cause catastrophic damages and result in failure of essential military weapons and military equipment.
Whistleblowers that have 
       independent knowledge of military electronic 
       component supply chain procurement fraud and false certification of electronic components that is being committed 
       against the government by government contractors and 
       subcontractors can blow the whistle on the 
       military procurement fraud and if they are the first to 
       provide notice of the fraud can recover a large 
       financial reward for helping the government identify 
       and stop procurement fraud.
Over a Million Fake 
       Components Have Been Used by Government Contractors 
       In United States War Planes Many of these Fake Part 
       Came from China
"The US Senate Armed Services 
       Committee said its researchers had uncovered 1,800 
       cases in which the Pentagon had been sold 
       electronics that may be counterfeit.  In total, 
       the committee said it had found more than a million 
       fake parts had made their way into warplanes such as 
       the Boeing C-17 transport jet and the Lockheed 
       Martin C-130J 'Super Hercules'.  It also found 
       fake components in Boeing's CH-46 Sea Knight 
       helicopter and the Theatre High-Altitude Area 
       Defence (THAAD) missile defence system. 'A million 
       parts is surely a huge number. But I want to repeat 
       this: we have only looked at a portion of the 
       defence supply chain. So those 1,800 cases are just 
       the tip of the iceberg,' said Senator Carl Levin. In 
       around seven in 10 cases, the fake parts originated 
       in China, while investigators traced another 20 per 
       cent of cases to the United Kingdom and Canada, 
       known resale points for Chinese counterfeits."
       
       US weapons 'full of fake Chinese parts' Thousands of 
       United States' warplanes, ships and missiles contain 
       fake electronic components from China, leaving them 
       open to malfunction, according to a US Senate 
       committee.
      Military Contractor 
       Fake Electronic Component Whistleblower 
      Lawyer, Mexico Electronic Component Manufacturer Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer, Military 
       Contractor Defective Military Electronic Part Mexico Manufacturer Whistleblower 
       Lawyer, Military Contractor Military Electronic Part China Manufacturer Fraud 
       Lawyer, Military Contractor Procurement Fraud 
      Whistleblower Lawyer, Defense Contractor False 
      Certification of Electronic Components Whistleblower Reward Lawyer, and 
      International Defense Contractor Procurement Fraud Qui Tam 
      Lawyer 
       
Whistleblowers that have 
       independent knowledge of military electronic 
       component supply chain procurement fraud committed 
       against the government by government contractors and 
       subcontractors should blow the whistle on the 
       defense contractor military procurement fraud including fake electronic component being used in war planes, military weapons, and other military equipment.  If the whistleblower is the first to 
       provide proper notice and evidence of the fraud, the whistleblower can recover a large 
       financial reward for helping the government identify 
       and stop procurement fraud.
Monday, April 2, 2012
Pancreatic Cancer Risk: Persons Taking Januvia and Janumet Should Be Aware of Pancreatic Cancer Danger and Consult Their Physician Regarding Potential Pancreas Cancer Risks by Texas Januvia Pancreatic Cancer Lawyer, Januvia Pancreatitis Lawyer, Janumet Pancreatic Cancer Lawyer and Januvia Pancreas Cancer Lawyer Jason S. Coomer
Pancreatic Cancer: Persons Taking Januvia 
     and Janumet 
     Should Be Aware of Pancreatic Cancer Danger and Consult 
     Their Physician Regarding Potential Pancreas Cancer Risks by Texas 
     Januvia Pancreatic 
     Cancer Lawyer, Januvia Pancreatitis Lawyer, Janumet 
     Pancreatic Cancer Lawyer and Januvia 
     Pancreas Cancer Lawyer Jason S. Coomer
Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause 
    of cancer death for both men and women and is one of the most 
    deadly of all types of cancer. The 
    diabetes drugs, Januvia and Janumet, 
    may cause an 
    increased risk of pancreatic cancer 
    in patients using Januvia. If you 
    have lost a loved one from Pancreatic Cancer or have suffered acute pancreatitis, 
    hemorrhagic pancreatitis, accute necrotizing pancreatitis, or 
    pancreatic cancer; and have 
    been using Januvia, please report the adverse action to the 
    prescribing medical doctor as soon as possible.  For more 
    information on this topic,
    
     please feel free to contact Januvia Pancreatic Cancer Lawyer, 
    Januvia Cancer Lawyer, and Janumet Pancreatic Cancer Lawyer 
    Jason Coomer, or 
    use 
    our online submission form.  
The 
    Diabetes Drug Market is Over $40 Billion Each Year and Growing 
    Rapidly Januvia and Janumet had Annual Sales of $4.7 Billion in 2011
More than 300 
    million people worldwide suffer from diabetes, including about 
    30 million Americans.  In 2010, the global 
    prevalence of diabetes was estimated to have reached 285 million 
    and predicted to reach 438 million in 2030. The corresponding 
    figures for North America were 37.4 million in 2010 and 53.2 
    million by 2030 and in Europe 55.2 million in 2010 and 66.2 
    million in 2030.  The global market for products in 
    the management of diabetes currently stands at $41 billion and 
    is on pace to grow to over $114 billion by 2018.  
In 2011, Januvia annual sales rose 39%, to 
    $3.3 billion, from $2.4 billion the year before and $1.9 in 
    2009. Januvia along with its sister drug Janumet (a combination 
    of Januvia and metformin) has combined for sales of $4.7 billion 
    for 2011.  Sales of Januvia and Merck’s Januvia (sitagliptin) 
    is approved in all major markets and have outdone initial 
    estimates for the drugs.  
Merck’s Januvia (sitagliptin) is approved in 
    all major markets and is the first in a new class of diabetic 
    drugs called dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors.  It 
    is approved by the FDA as an adjunct to diet and exercise to 
    improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes 
    mellitus.
FDA Information on Sitagliptin (marketed 
    as Januvia and Janumet) 
[09-25-2009] FDA is revising the prescribing 
    information for Januvia (sitagliptin) and Janumet (sitagliptin/metformin) 
    to include information on reported cases of acute pancreatitis 
    in patients using these products. 
Sitagliptin, the first in a new class of 
    diabetic drugs called dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, 
    is approved as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve 
    glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. 
Eighty-eight post-marketing cases of acute 
    pancreatitis, including two cases of hemorrhagic or necrotizing 
    pancreatitis in patients using sitagliptin, were reported to the 
    Agency between October 16, 2006 and February 9, 2009. Based on 
    these reports, FDA is working with the manufacturer of 
    sitagliptin and sitagliptin/metformin to revise the prescribing 
    information to include: 
Information regarding post-marketing reports 
    of acute pancreatitis, including the severe forms, hemorrhagic 
    or necrotizing pancreatitis. Recommending that healthcare 
    professionals monitor patients carefully for the development of 
    pancreatitis after initiation or dose increases of sitagliptin 
    or sitagliptin/metformin, and to discontinue sitagliptin or 
    sitagliptin/metformin if pancreatitis is suspected while using 
    these products. Information noting that sitagliptin has not been 
    studied in patients with a history of pancreatitis. Therefore, 
    it is not known whether these patients are at an increased risk 
    for developing pancreatitis while using sitagliptin or 
    sitagliptin/metformin. Sitagliptin or sitagliptin/metformin 
    should be used with caution and with appropriate monitoring in 
    patients with a history of pancreatitis.
Januvia Pancreatic Cancer Lawsuit 
    Information, Januvia Pancreatitis Lawsuit Information and 
    Januvia Pancreas Cancer Lawsuit Information
Between October 16, 2006 and February 9, 
    2009, the FDA received 88 post-marketing cases of acute 
    pancreatitis, of which 66 required hospitalization. The FDA 
    review also found that in over half of these cases, the 
    patient’s pancreatitis resolved once Januvia was discontinued. 
    While diabetics are more vulnerable to developing pancreatitis 
    than those without the disease, it does appear that taking 
    Januvia can potentially increase that risk. And, if pancreatitis 
    becomes chronic, the inflammation of the pancreas will alter its 
    normal structure and functions.
Pancreatic Carinoma, Pancreatic Cancer, and Cancer 
     Pancreas
Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading 
     cause of cancer death for both men and women and is one of 
     the most deadly of all types of cancer. This year 
     approximately 45,000 Americans will be diagnosed with 
     pancreatic cancer and about 38,000 will die from it.
Unfortunately, pancreatic cancer is 
     difficult to diagnose, and the diagnosis is often made late 
     in the course of the disease.  Early detection of 
     pancreatic cancer is essential and will greatly improve a 
     person's chances of surviving the disease. As such, people 
     that have taken Byetta, especially those with symptoms of 
     weight loss, dark urine and clay-colored stools, back pain, 
     and jaundice, should seek advice from a qualified medical 
     professional as to if they may have pancreatic cancer and 
     what symptoms they should be aware of to detect any early 
     onset of pancreatic cancer.
Pancreatic Cancer, Exocrine Pancreas Cancers (Pancreatic 
     Adenocarcinoma) and Endocrine Pancreatic Cancers
The pancreas is a large organ located 
     behind the stomach and in front of the spine above the level 
     of the belly button. The pancreas performs two main 
     functions:  1) it makes insulin, a hormone that 
     regulates blood sugar levels, and 2) it makes enzymes. The 
     pancreas makes and releases enzymes into the intestines that 
     help the body absorb foods, especially fats.  The 
     pancreas is made of Exocrine cells and Endocrine cells.  
     Exocrine cells are cells that produce a pancreatic juice 
     that includes enzymes which aid in the digestion of food in 
     the small intestine, breaking up proteins, carbohydrates, 
     and fats.  
The most common kind of pancreatic cancer 
     is pancreatic adenocarcinoma and includes about 90% of the 
     cases of pancreatic cancer.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma 
     is a cancerous overgrowth of exocrine pancreatic cells and 
     is unfortunately commonly undetected until it is too late 
     for the patient.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma because of 
     late detection can often result a fatal diagnosis with very 
     limited survival time. Other forms of exocrine pancreas 
     cancer include: intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm 
     (IPMN), adenosquamous carcinomas, acinar cell carcinomas, 
     mucinous cystadenocarcinomas, signet ring cell carcinomas, 
     hepatoid carcinomas, colloid carcinomas, undifferentiated 
     carcinomas, pancreatoblastomas, and undifferentiated 
     carcinomas with osteoclast-like giant cells.
Endocrine cells are clustered in small 
     groups (called the Islets of Langerhans) scattered 
     throughout the pancreas. These endocrine cells produce 
     important hormones such as insulin, glucagon, and 
     somatostatin.  The hormones called insulin and glucagon 
     help your body control blood sugar levels. Tumors can also 
     occur in these cells, but they are called islet cell tumors 
     and are rare. 
The exact cause of pancreatic cancer is 
     unknown. However, it is more common in people with diabetes 
     and people with long-term inflammation of the pancreas 
     (chronic pancreatitis).  It is also thought that the 
     use of Byetta can cause pancreatitis resulting in pancreatic 
     cancer. 
Symptoms of pancreatic cancer can 
     include: dark urine and clay-colored stools, fatigue and 
     weakness, jaundice (a yellow color in the skin, mucus 
     membranes, or eyes), loss of appetite and weight loss, 
     nausea and vomiting, pain or discomfort in the upper part of 
     the belly or abdomen, back pain, blood clots, diarrhea, and 
     indigestion.
Pancreatic cancer is often not detected 
     early on and is often advanced when it is first found.  
     As such, ninety-five percent of the people diagnosed with 
     this cancer will not be alive 5 years later.  Some 
     patients have pancreatic cancer that can be surgically 
     removed are cured. However, in more than 80% of patients the 
     tumor has already spread and cannot be completely removed at 
     the time of diagnosis.  In the few cases where 
     pancreatic tumors can be removed by surgery. The standard 
     surgical procedure to remove pancreatic tumors is called a 
     Whipple procedure (pancreatoduodenectomy or 
     pancreaticoduodenectomy). This surgery should be done by an 
     experienced surgeon and at a medical center that performs 
     the procedure often. Some studies suggest that the Whipple 
     procedure is best performed at hospitals that do more than 
     five of these surgeries per year. 
When the tumor has not spread out of the 
     pancreas, but cannot be removed, radiation therapy and 
     chemotherapy together may be recommended. When the tumor has 
     spread (metastasized) to other organs such as the liver, 
     chemotherapy alone is usually used. The standard 
     chemotherapy drug is gemcitabine, but other drugs may be 
     used. Gemcitabine can help about 25% of patients. 
Patients whose tumor cannot be totally 
     removed, but who have a blockage of the tubes that transport 
     bile (biliary obstruction) must have that blockage relieved. 
     There are two approaches including surgery and placement of 
     a tiny metal tube (biliary stent) during ERCP. 
Managing pain and other symptoms is an 
     important part of treating advanced pancreatic cancer. 
     Palliative care tams and hospice can help with pain and 
     symptom management, and provide psychological support for 
     patients and their families during the illness.
Acute Pancreatitis, Hemorrhagic 
    Pancreatitis, Necrotizing Pancreatitis 
Acute pancreatitis is a sudden inflammation of the pancreas 
    that occurs over a short period of time. The pancreas is a 
    digestive organ behind the stomach that secretes essential 
    enzymes needed for the digestion of certain foods, including 
    fats, carbohydrates and proteins. During an episode of acute 
    hemorrhagic pancreatitis, several symptoms relating to digestion 
    and abdomen may occur.  In severe cases, the person may 
    experience confusion, difficulty breathing, or respiratory 
    failure.  The person may also fall into a coma.
The severity of acute 
    pancreatitis may range from mild abdominal discomfort to a 
    severe, life-threatening illness. However, the majority of 
    people with acute pancreatitis (more than 80%) recover 
    completely after receiving the appropriate treatment.  In 
    very severe cases, acute pancreatitis can result in bleeding 
    into the gland, serious tissue damage, infection, and cyst 
    formation. Severe pancreatitis can also create conditions which 
    can harm other vital organs such as the heart, lungs, and 
    kidneys.
The warning signs of pancreatitis include: 1) Upper abdominal 
    pain that radiates into the back. Patients may describe this as 
    a "boring sensation" that may be aggravated by eating, 
    especially foods high in fat. 2) Swollen and tender abdomen 3) 
    Nausea and vomiting 4) Fever  and 5) Increased heart rate.
Acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis is the sudden 
    inflammation of the pancreas. This leads to death of pancreatic 
    tissue and the formation of lesions, causing extensive bleeding. Necrotizing pancreatitis is a serious health condition where 
    a person's pancreas is inflamed and bleeding. In Necrotizing 
    Pancreatitis patients, there is inflammation and tissue death, 
    with the pancreas destroying itself.  Whereas in 
    Hemorrhagic Pancreatitis patients, the pancreas is bleeding.  
    Both are serious conditions and should be treated immediately.
Januvia Pancreatic Cancer Death Lawyer, Janumet 
     Pancreatic Cancer Lawyer, Sitagliptin Pancreatic Cancer 
     Lawyer, Sitagliptin/Metformin Pancreatic Cancer Lawyer, 
     Janumet Pancreas Cancer Lawyer, Sitagliptin Panreas Cancer 
     Lawyer, and Januvia Pancreatitis Lawyer 
If you 
    have lost a loved one from Pancreatic Cancer or have suffered acute pancreatitis, 
    hemorrhagic pancreatitis, accute necrotizing pancreatitis, or 
    pancreas cancer; and have 
    been using Januvia, please report the adverse action 
    to the prescribing medical doctor as soon as possible.  For more information on 
     Januvia 
    Pancreatic Cancer Lawsuits, Januvia Cancer Death Lawsuits, or 
     Januvia 
    Pancreas Cancer Lawsuits, please go to the following webpage: Januvia     Pancreatic Cancer Lawsuit, Januvia Cancer Death Lawsuit, or      Januvia     Pancreas Cancer Lawsuit Information.
Sunday, March 25, 2012
Pharmaceutical World Sales Increase to Over $880 Billion Per Year Including Large Sales Increases in the "Pharmering Countries" by International Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer and International Adulterated Drug Whistleblower Lawyer Jason S. Coomer
Pharmaceutical World Sales Increase 
      to Over $880 Billion Per Year Including Large Sales 
      Increases in the "Pharmering 
      Countries" by International Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Fraud 
     Whistleblower Lawyer and International Adulterated Drug 
     Whistleblower Lawyer Jason S. Coomer
Every year over $4.1 trillion (US 
       dollars) is spent worldwide on health services 
       including approximately $850 billion (US dollars) 
       that is spent in the pharmaceutical market on drugs 
       and medications.  In 2011, it is estimated that 
       global pharmaceutical sales are expected to grow by 
       5% to 7% to around $880 billion.  This 
       growth in sales is led by the 17 so-called "pharmerging 
       countries," which include China, Brazil, Russia, 
       India, Venezuela, Poland and the Ukraine.  
       These "pharmerging countries", are forecast to see 
       their pharmaceutical spending grow at a 15% to 17% 
       rate in 2011, to between $170 billion and $180 
       billion overall.
Eight pharmerging countries are 
       amongst the top 20 world pharmaceutical markets, and 
       China is one of the “top three” or will be in the 
       near future.  A few high-profile pharmaceutical 
       companies have been successful in gaining a foothold 
       in these pharmering countries.  These footholds 
       include Abbott’s acquisition of Piramal Healthcare 
       in India — a deal that could potentially make the US 
       giant the top player in this country.  Bayer's 
       and Novartis' investments in China including 
       Novartis'  commitment to invest $1 billion USD 
       in R&D in China and its $125 million USD investment 
       to buy 85 percent stake in a privately held vaccine 
       company.  Pfizer has made inroads into the 
       Russian health care system with a discount-card 
       system in Russia  Sanofi Aventis has purchased 
       Medley, Brazil’s third-largest pharmaceutical 
       company.  GSK and Lilly have also announced 
       anticipated doubling their revenue in emerging 
       markets by 2015. 
It is estimated that 
       approximately 10 to 25% of public health care 
       procurement spending including drug contracts, 
       medicines, pharmaceuticals, medical equipment, and 
       medical devices is lost to corrupt and fraudulent 
       acts including adulterated drugs.  As such, 
       there is an international movement to reward 
       pharmaceutical professionals and health care 
       professionals that expose fraudulent and corrupt 
       practices that cost hundreds of billions of dollars 
       and cost lives.  This international movement 
       includes SEC Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 
       Whistleblower Reward Lawsuits and traditional Qui 
       Tam False Claims Act Whistleblower Reward Lawsuits.   
Increased Competition and 
       Expansion in the Pharmaceutical Industry Creates 
       Opportunity for Increased Corruption in 
       Pharmaceutical Procement  and Expands the 
       Opportunity for Fraud in Pharmaceutical Drug Supply 
      Chains that can create Dangerous Adulterated Drugs
Included in this
       
       globalization of the pharmaceutical industry is a 
       shift in many international pharmaceutical 
       manufacturing supply chains where raw material 
       supplies for pharmaceuticals, medical supplies, and 
       medical equipment that were traditionally from the 
       United States and Europe are now produced in from 
       China and India as well as other emerging 
       countries.  This manufacturing shift create has 
       created an environment where adulterated ingredients 
       to pharmaceuticals, medical supplies, and medical 
       devices may be used in the manufacturing of these 
       products and can create dangerous and defective 
       drugs, medical supplies, and medical devices being 
       purchased by governments and given to patients. 
        
International Pharmaceutical 
       Supply Chains Include Active Pharmaceutical 
       Ingredient (API) Manufacturers, Pharmaceutical 
       Intermediate Manufacturers, and Pharmaceutical 
       Excipient Manufacturers All of Which Can Cause 
       Adulterated and Dangerous Pharmaceuticals if 
       Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Fraud Occurs  
Pharmaceutical 
       suppliers of raw materials to the pharmaceutical 
       industry include suppliers of active 
       pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), 
       intermediates, and excipients.   It 
       is the United States Food and Drug Administration's 
       expectation that current good manufacturing 
       practices (CGMP) be used for the manufacturing, 
       processing, packing, or holding (i.e., storage) of 
       active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), 
       intermediates, and excipients.  Further, the 
       FDA recommends that laboratory controls should 
       include the establishment of scientifically sound 
       and appropriate specifications, standards, sampling 
       plans, and test procedures to ensure that raw 
       materials, intermediates, APIs, and containers 
       conform to established standards of quality and 
       purity.
International Adulterated 
       Drug Supply 
      Chain Whistleblower Reward Lawyer, International 
       Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Fraud Whistleblower 
      Lawyer, Medicine Supply Chain Whistleblower Reward Lawyer, Medicine 
      Supply Chain Fraud Lawyer, and Pharmaceutical Supply Chain 
      Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Lawyer
International Whistleblowers along the 
       pharmaceutical supply chain and other health care 
       professionals  
       are being offered large potential rewards to blow the whistle on adulterated 
       pharmaceutical ingredients, adulterated medicine, 
       adulterated drugs, contaminated medical supplies, 
       and defective medical 
       devices.  These whistleblower rewards can come 
       from SEC Whistleblower Reward Lawsuits and 
       traditional Qui Tam False Claims Act Whistleblower 
       Reward Lawsuits.  For more information on these 
       potential whistleblower rewards, feel free to go to the following web pages: International Adulterated        Drug Supply Chain Whistleblower Reward Lawsuits, 
       Drug
  Safety Fraud Qui Tam Adulterated Drug  
Whistleblower Reward Lawsuits, Off-Label Pharmaceutical Medicare Fraud Whistleblower Lawsuits and 
     Drug Procurement Illegal Kickback Lawsuit
Sunday, March 18, 2012
Austin Sees Increase in Fatal Pedestrian Automobile Accidents
The Texas Driver's Handbook is very clear that pedestrian's have the right of way on Texas roads. It warns drivers to avoid turning their vehicles into a deadly weapon and to always be aware of any pedestrians. This rule is especially true when a pedestrian is in a crosswalk or in a schooling crossing. In these situations, pedestrians always have the right of way.
Increased number of auto-pedestrian fatalities in Austin arouses concern
Austin Texas Pedestrian Accident Lawsuit Information
Sunday, March 11, 2012
Friday, March 9, 2012
International Whistleblowers Are Receiving Large Rewards for Exposing Government Procurement Bribe Schemes and other Government Corruption by International Government Procurement Bribe Whistleblower Lawyer, International Procurement Contract Bribe Lawyer, and International Procurement Illegal Kickback Whistleblower Attorney Jason S. Coomer
Worldwide 
      government purchasing or government procurement is estimated to be 
      over $10 Trillion 
      each year.  Of this large amount of government 
      purchasing, it is estimated that as much as 20% may be 
      through illegal bribes, kickbacks, and other illicit 
      payments.  Government procurement spending 
      includes military spending; public works projects; 
      public health care (pharmaceuticals, medical equipment, 
      & hospitals); ports, transportation, & roads; mining and oil extraction; power grid and 
      stations; education; law enforcement; and sanitation 
      services.  Because of the vast amount of money 
      spent by governments on government procurement, there 
      are many different types of government procurement 
      illegal bribery schemes, illegal kickback schemes, and 
      other illicit payment schemes that have been created to 
      steal money from the public at the expense of a 
      country's citizens.
For more information on Exposing Government Corruption and Illegal Government Purchasing Kickbacks, please feel free to go to the following web page on International Whistleblower Government Procurement Reward Bounty Actions.
For more information on Exposing Government Corruption and Illegal Government Purchasing Kickbacks, please feel free to go to the following web page on International Whistleblower Government Procurement Reward Bounty Actions.
Monday, February 20, 2012
International Medicine Procurement Illegal Bribe Whistleblower Reward Lawsuit, Medicines Supply Chain Bribe Whistleblower Lawsuit, and International Medicine Procurement Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Lawsuit Information by International Medicine Procurement Illegal Bribe Whistleblower Lawyer, Drug Procurement Contract Bribe Lawyer, and International Medicines Illegal Kickback Whistleblower Reward Lawyer Jason S. Coomer
      International Medicine Procurement Illegal Bribe Whistleblower Reward Lawsuit,       Medicine Supply Chain Bribe Whistleblower Lawsuit,       Drug Procurement Illegal Kickback Lawsuit,       Pharmaceutical Representative Whistleblower Reward Lawsuit, and       Drug Representative Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Lawsuit       Information by International Medicine Procurement Illegal Bribe       Whistleblower Lawyer, Drug Procurement Contract Bribe Lawyer, and       International       Drug Representative Illegal Kickback Whistleblower Reward Lawyer       Jason S. Coomer
 Every year over $4.1 trillion (US        dollars) is spent worldwide on health services including        approximately $750 billion (US dollars) that is spent in        the pharmaceutical market on drugs and medications. It        is estimated that approximately 10 to 25% of public        health care procurement spending including drug        contracts, medicines, pharmaceuticals, medical        equipment, and medical devices is lost to corrupt and        fraudulent acts.  These acts include government        official bribes, illegal kickbacks, and other illicit        payment and fraud schemes. 
The              World Health Organization (WHO) defines the term        "medicines chain" to be the steps that are required for        the creation, regulation, management and consumption of        pharmaceuticals.  In other words it is the        medication supply chain in the pharmaceutical industry        from creation to end user. According to the World Health        Organization, corruption is common in the international        pharmaceutical sector and occurs throughout all stages        of the medicines supply chain, from research and        development to dispensing and promotion.  These        unethical and corrupt practices in the medicines supply        chain can take many forms such as falsification of        evidence, false certification of adulterated drugs,        import false certifications, export false        certifications, conflicts of interest, and illegal bribe        and kickback schemes.  
As such, the World Health        Organization and many other international public health        organizations are seeking public policy changes under        the umbrella of good governance initiatives within the        medicines chain to reduce government corruption and        optimize public health outcomes.  Some proposed        public policy changes that can help reduce corruption        and fraud in the pharmaceutical medicines chain include:        1) protection of international medicines supply chain        whistleblowers; 2) offering financial incentives to        international medicines chain whistleblowers; 3) passage        of legislation and regulation for drug quality control        and official certifications to monitor the transport of        medications including the export and import of medicines        throughout world and along international medicines        supply chains; 4) increased enforcement mechanisms for        violations of existing pharmaceutical laws and        regulations; and 5) increased resources for conflict of        interest management and checks to ensure key people in        the medicines chain are not accepting illegal bribes,        kickbacks, and other illicit payments.
In response to these good governance        initiatives, the international community including the        United States, United Kingdom, and many other countries        have enacted new anti-bribery and anti corruption laws        that will enable persons with knowledge of international        medicines supply chain fraud and corruption to expose        the illegal acts and reap rewards from blowing the        whistle, while being protected from potential        retaliation from the wrong doers.
While there are an increasing number        of reported cases of corruption in the medicines chain,        much unethical practice has historically gone        unreported.  This is changing as new whistleblower        protections and whistleblower financial incentives are        coming into place to help overcome         institutionalized corruption in the pharmaceutical        medicines chain and to provide protection for courageous        whistleblowers that want to change the institutionalized        corruption that is damaging their countries. 
Because medicines typically change        hands several times in the medicines chain between the        drug manufacturer and patients, the large number of        steps in the medicines chain allows numerous        opportunities for unethical practices to take place.         Therefore increased regulations and laws throughout the        medicines chain including manufacturing quality        assurances, export regulations and inspections, import        regulations and inspections, health care provider        regulations and inventory policies, and patient        protections are needed.  Fortunately, the new        international whistleblower laws will allow        international whistleblowers with specialized knowledge        of the corruption to blow the whistle on fraud, false        certifications, and illicit payments that are occurring        throughout the medicines chain.     
A lack of transparency and        accountability within the medicines chain can also        contribute to unethical practices and corruption.         Therefore increased enforcement mechanisms are needed        for violations of existing pharmaceutical laws and        regulations.  These enforcement mechanisms include        "SEC Bounty Actions" that allow private citizens to work        through international medicines supply chain        whistleblower reward lawyers to expose significant fraud        and obtain large bounties for successful prosecution of        pharmaceutical illicit payment schemes.  Ideally,        these international medicines supply chain whistleblower        reward actions will track fraud and corruption to the        root causes and help reform corporate corruption of        public health care systems.  Through international        pharmaceutical representative whistleblowers,        international drug executive whistleblowers, foreign        government official whistleblowers, health care provider        whistleblowers, and other medicines supply chain        whistleblowers, the international community can        efficiently identify, expose, and remedy medicines chain        corruption.
      International Medicines Supply Chain Whistleblower       Reward Lawyer, International Medicines Chain Drug Contract       Bribe Whistleblower Lawyer, Medicine Contract Illegal       Kickback Lawyer, Medicines Chain Whistleblower Reward Lawyer,       Medicines Supply Chain Fraud Lawyer, and       Medicines Supply Chain Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Lawyer
International        whistleblowers can recover large amounts of money for        exposing international medicine procurement kickbacks,        medicines supply chain bribes, and        other violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.         As such,        pharmaceutical representatives, international drug        executives, government officials, physicians, health        care providers, community activists, and other persons,        who are the original source of specialized knowledge of        international drug company bribes, international        pharmaceutical company illegal kickback schemes, public health        medicine procurement bribery schemes, and other illicit payments for        drug procurement, medical device procurement, medication, pharmaceutical, and        medical equipment contracts.  
For more information on  Public Health Care Procurement Bribe Whistleblower Reward Lawsuits, please feel free to go to the following web page on        International Medicine Supply Chain Whistleblower Reward       Lawsuit, International Drug Representative Whistleblower       Reward Lawsuit, Drug Contract Bribe Whistleblower       Lawsuit, Medication Contract Illegal Kickback Lawsuit,       Pharmaceutical Representative Whistleblower Reward       Lawsuit, and Drug Representative Foreign Corrupt       Practices Act Lawsuit Information.  
Thursday, February 16, 2012
China Import Export Bribe Whistleblower Reward Lawsuit, China Customs Illegal Kickback Informant Reward Lawsuit, & China Illegal International Trade Bounty Action Information by China International Business Bribe Bounty Lawyer, China Import Export Bribe Lawyer, and China Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Violation Lawyer Jason S. Coomer
      China Import Export Bribe       Lawsuit, China Business Bribe       Bounty Reward Lawsuit, China Customs       Illegal Kickback Informant Reward Lawsuit, & China Illegal       International Trade Bounty Action Information by China International       Business Bribe       Bounty Lawyer, China Import Export Bribe       Lawyer, and China Foreign Corrupt Practices Act       Violation Lawyer Jason S. Coomer       
Foreign        multinational corporations investing in the People's        Republic of China and Chinese multinational corporations        investing in other countries can often be held        accountable when they violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices        Act (FCPA) and other anti-bribery laws.  These laws        prevent government        corruption including illegal payments to customs agents,        bribes for construction contracts, illegal kickbacks for regulatory        approval, and other illegal business        practices.  Through the        Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), whistleblowers are        encouraged to step        up and confidentially report corruption.  Under new        whistleblower protections, these Chinese whistleblowers and multinational        corporation whistleblowers can confidentially report        violations through a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act        Lawyer and receive large financial        rewards for being the first to properly expose        significant government corruption.  
China's Emerges as an Economic Superpower        through International Trade, Modernizing Chinese Ports &        Distribution Systems, Logistics Parks, and Allowing Foreign Investment
The People's Republic of China (PRC)        has a population of over 1.3 billion and is the most        populous state in the world.  The Communist Party        of China governs the        People's Republic of China and exercises control over 22 provinces (23        provinces if Taiwan is included), five autonomous        regions, four directly controlled municipalities        (Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, and Chongqing), and two        mostly self-governing special administrative regions (SARs),        Hong Kong and Macau. Because of this government control        of Chinese industries, bribery of Chinese officials,        Chinese government bribes, and illegal kickbacks to        Chinese customs agents and Chinese regulatory agents are        more common.  
The capital city of the People's        Republic of China (PRC) is Beijing.         Since the introduction of market-based economic reforms        in 1978, China has become the world's fastest-growing        major economy.  Since the 1980s,        the People's Republic of China has used international        trade and foreign investment to emerge as an economic        superpower.  From 2001 to 2010, China's        international trade imports and exports increased from        about $500 billion per year to approximately $3 trillion        per year.  A large part of this rapid expansion can        be attributed to foreign direct investment that has        surged into China.  As of 2012, the People's        Republic of China (PRC) has become the world's        second-largest economy by both nominal GDP and        purchasing power parity (PPP), and is also the world's        largest exporter and second-largest importer of goods.
China has spent large amounts of        money to construct and modernize approximately 160        Chinese ports including about 50 coastal ports and 110        inland river ports. These ports are an essential part of        the development of China's massive import and export        international trade.  By investing billions of        dollars in these ports, China had been able to        drastically increase the total handling capacity of        harbors along China’s coast as well as continuously        expand its import and export businesses. 
The Modernization of Chinese Ports &        Distribution Systems by Allowing Foreign Investment has        Greatly Expanded China's Ability to Import and Export        Goods as well as Develop Manufacturing Industries
This Chinese import and export        network is formed around three major harbor areas: 1)        The Bohai Sea area of northern China (including Beijing)        is serviced by the ports of Tianjin, Dalian and Yantai;        2) the Yangtze River Delta area includes the ports of        Shanghai and Ningbo; and 3) the Pearl River Delta in        southern China includes the ports of Shenzhen, Guangzhou        and Hong Kong. These ports have experienced tremendous        growth and expansion over the last decade and have        helped China increase its international trade. 
To help develop Chinese ports, the        Chinese government has encouraged foreign direct        investment into port modernization programs.  By        bringing in foreign investments including resources and        technology, the Chinese government has been able to        successfully expand international trade including        imports and exports.  Through liberalization of        foreign investment restrictions in the modernization of        Chinese ports, the Chinese ministries have been able to        improve international trade and port logistics         including in the areas of transportation, freight        forwarding, storage, warehousing, and port management.
China's largest and busiest ports        include Port of Hong Kong, Port Shanghai, Port of        Shenzhen, Port of Guangzhou, Port of Qingdao, Port of        Dalian, Port of Lüshunkou, Port of Jiuzhou, Port of        Suzhou, Port of Xiamen, Port of Ningbo, and Port of        Tianjin.  This thriving network of Chinese ports        have seen modernization and logistical technology used        to greatly increase China's ability to import and export        goods leading to economic prosperity. 
However, with this expansion on        imports and exports has come fierce competition for        Chinese business and huge profits that can be obtained        through government corruption and illegal bribes.         These violations include violations of the Foreign        Corrupt Practices Act by Multinational Corporations,        their wholly owned subsidiaries, joint venture partners,        and agents.  These complicated business structures        commonly create elaborate bribery schemes to obtain and        retain Chinese business including bribing public        officials and customs agents to circumvent container        certification, legal customs, import requirements, and        other legal requirements.  These illicit payments        are often paid through an elaborate kickback scheme        where employees and agents of large multinational        corporation or their wholly owned subsidiary falsely        characterize illicit payments to public officials as        commissions or other expenses.  Many of these        illicit payments are made through foreign banks and are        actually kickbacks paid to government officials.
      China Import Bribe Lawyer, China Export Bribe Lawyer, China FCPA Violation       Lawyer, Chinese Government Official Illegal Payment        Whistleblower Reward Lawyer, Chinese Government Corruption       Confidential Whistleblower Lawyer, China Business Bribe       Bounty Action, China       Illegal Kickback Informant Reward Lawyer, China Illegal       International Trade Bounty Action Lawyer, & Peoples'       Republic of China Government       Agent Illegal Payment       Bounty Lawyer        
There is a worldwide effort by the        international community to crack down on government        corruption, illegal kickbacks, and illegal bribes.         This effort includes initiatives by the United States to        identify and prosecute illegal bribery schemes of        government officials.  To identify hard to detect        bribery schemes, the United States Securities Exchange        Commission is offering large bounties (whistleblower        rewards) for persons with specialized knowledge of        systematic bribes and complicated bribery schemes.         These large economic incentives are designed to        encourage import export experts, customs experts,        logistics experts, and other persons aware of        complicated import and export bribes and government        fraud to step up and become a confidential import export        bribe whistleblower, customs fraud whistleblower,        logistics whistleblower, and other international trade        whistleblower. 
The United States Bounty Actions are        set up under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).         The FCPA        applies to “issuers” (U.S. and foreign companies listed        on U.S. securities exchanges and their employees);        “domestic concerns,” which run the gamut of business        entities organized under U.S. laws or with their        principal place of business in the United States; the        officers, directors, employees, and agents of those U.S.        business entities (irrespective of nationality); U.S.        citizens; U.S. resident aliens; “any person,” including        all foreign persons, who commit an act in furtherance of        a foreign bribe while in the United States, and U.S.        businesses and nationals acting abroad. A Company must        require all of its affiliated companies and all of their        employees to comply with the Foreign Corrupt Practices        Act. 
For information on specific Chinese        Ports and more information on China Import Bribe        Whistleblower Actions and China Export Bribe        Whistleblower Actions, please go to the following web        pages on China        False Container Certification Bribe Lawyer, China Export Bribe Lawyer, China        Port Official Bribe Lawyer, Chinese Government Official        Illegal Payment Whistleblower Reward Lawyer, and China        Customs Agent Bribe Lawyer Information and China International      Business Bribe      Bounty Lawyer, China Import Export Bribe      Lawyer, and China Foreign Corrupt Practices Act      Violation Lawyer Information.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
