Texas VA Medical Mistake Lawyer: Reporting VA Medical Mistakes Helps Protect Military and Their Families From Careless Medical Providers and Negligent Procedures That Can Injure or Kill By Texas VA Medical Mistake Lawyer

VA Medical Mistake Lawyer: Reporting Negligence in Military Hospitals Helps Protect Our Military and Their Families From Careless Medical Providers and Negligent Procedures That Injure and Kill People by Texas VA Medical Mistake Lawyer

Medical mistakes that happen when no one is watching and that are not reported can often be repeated.  When these medical mistakes cause serious injury, birth injuries, or death, it is important that the injured person or their family step up and file a VA Medical Mistake lawsuit.  The filing of a VA medical mistake claim under the Federal Torts Claim Act can often expose careless doctors, negligent nurses, and other medical providers who are hurting and killing people.   

For information on a Texas VA Medical Mistake Lawsuit or other VA Medical Mistake Lawsuit, please feel to contact Texas Military Doctor Medical Malpractice Lawyer, Jason S. Coomer or go to the following web pages: Military Medical Malpractice Birth Injury Lawsuit Information, VA Military Medical Malpractice FTCA Lawsuit Information, or Medical Mistake Infant Death, Birth Injury, and Birth Defect Lawsuit Information.

 Designation of a Medical Advocate or a Health Care Decision Maker During a Hospital Stay and Effective Communication with Military Health Care Providers Can Help Prevent Some VA Medical Mistakes

It is extremely important when you are in the hospital to have someone that is with you to help watch out for your well being.  This is especially true if you have an allergy to certain types of medicines, are going to be unconscious or under anesthesia, or on strong pain killers.  In such situations, it is typically a good idea to have a person that you trust to be your health care decision maker with a valid HIPPA Authorization, Medical Power of Attorney, Power of Attorney, and other necessary documents.  

Veterans have a right to express their preferences about future medical care in an advance directive. This includes the right to name a health care agent who will make health care decisions on their behalf if they can no longer communicate for themselves. We will respect these preferences.

If you are asked to make health care decisions for a Veteran in VHA, the treatment team will offer you: 

• Treatment options based on the Veteran's unique medical circumstances and needs.
• Information you can understand about the benefits and risks of these treatment options.

A health care decision maker generally has the same rights and responsibilities as the Veteran would have in making treatment decisions.

• A health care decision maker may agree to or refuse any treatment option offered by the treatment team. Refusing treatment will not affect the Veteran's right to future care.
• A health care decision maker's decision about whether to accept or refuse treatments must be based on what the health care decision maker knows the Veteran would want. If the health care decision maker does not know what the Veteran would want, the treatment team is available to help consider what decisions are in the Veteran's best interest.

Overall, communication with your health care professionals is important and can greatly limit medical mistakes.

Diabetes and Thyroid Cancer: Byetta and other Diabetes Medications May Cause An Increased Risk of Thyroid Cancer by Texas Diabetes Thyroid Cancer Lawyer

Diabetes and Thyroid Cancer: Byetta and Other Diabetes Medications May Cause An Increased Risk of Thyroid Cancer by Texas Byetta Diabetes Thyroid Cancer Lawyer

More than 200,000 people were newly diagnosed with thyroid cancer in 2012.  Recent scientific studies have shown that some of these people may have gotten thyroid cancer from taking a diabetes drug.  One such diabetes drug is Byetta.  Recent studies have shown that Byetta increases the risk of thyroid cancer.  Further, many lawsuits are currently being filed alleging that the maker of Byetta failed to provide adequate warnings to consumers and the medical community regarding this risk of thyroid cancer.

If you or a loved one has taken Byetta and has been diagnosed with thyroid cancer or pancreatic cancer, please feel free to contact Byetta Thyroid Cancer Lawyer, Byetta Cancer Lawyer, and Byetta Pancreatic Cancer Lawyer Jason Coomer.

Thyroid Cancer Information and Thyroid Cancer Symptoms

Thyroid cancer occurs in the cells of the thyroid.  The thyroid is a butterfly-shaped gland located at the base of your neck, just below your Adam's apple. Your thyroid produces hormones that regulate your heart rate, blood pressure, body temperature and weight. Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine cancer. It is a malignant tumor or growth originating within the thyroid gland, also called thyroid carcinoma.

The prognosis for any individual with thyroid cancer depends on several factors. These include the type of thyroid cancer, the tumor size, whether the disease has spread (metastasized) to other parts of the body (especially distant sites), and the patients’ age at the time of diagnosis. Thyroid cancer is usually highly treatable when found early and is usually painless and without symptoms in its early stages. Unless there is an obvious neck mass that can be seen, most nodules are detected by chance during a routine physical examination or during a doctor visit for an unrelated purpose.

Some thyroid cancer symptoms include:

•     Hoarseness that has no known cause and does not go away
•     Difficulty breathing or shortness of breath
•     Difficulty swallowing or an unusual sensation (a “lump”) when swallowing
•     Nodule (lump) or growth in the neck
•     An abnormally large lymph node (a “swollen gland”) that fails to spontaneously shrink over a few months' time

Texas Prompt Pay Act Offers Help to Medical Providers Against Health Insurance Companies That Delay and Deny Payments by Texas Prompt Payment Act Lawyer

Texas Medical Providers Are Owed Approximately $8 Billion by Health Insurance Companies: Texas Prompt Pay Act Offers Help to Medical Providers Against Health Insurance Companies That Delay and Deny Payments for Clean Claims by Texas Prompt Payment Act Lawyer Jason Coomer

It is estimated that insurance companies have wrongfully denied and delay payments of approximately $8 Billion dollars to Texas Medical Providers.  These delayed and denied payments have allowed some insurance companies to make large profits at the expense of hard working medical providers.  In response to these unethical insurance practices, Texas has enacted the Texas Prompt Payment Act that allows medical providers including hospitals, pharmacies, clinics, and physicians to seek payments, attorney's fees, and penalties from insurance companies that wrongfully deny and delay payments.

Texas Lawyers Are Seeking Prompt Payment From Insurance Carriers For Medical Providers

Insurance carriers that violate Texas prompt pay laws and miss the deadlines for paying or responding to health care provider claims may be held liable for penalties for being late.  For hospitals and physicians, the late penalties can begin within 45 days of receipt of a clean claim submitted non-electronically and within 30 days of receipt of a claim submitted electronically.  For pharmacies, the late penalties can begin within 18 days of electronically submitted bills.

The penalties for late payments include a fifty percent (50%) penalty of the difference between the provider's billed rate versus its contracted rate if the payment is 1 to 45 days late and a one-hundred percent (100%) penalty of the difference if the payment is 46 to 90 days late.  There are also provisions that allow an eighteen percent 18% late fee and attorneys fees to be collected on any late-paid bill. 

Texas Prompt Payment Lawyer, Jason S. Coomer, is a Texas business litigation lawyer that works with other powerful business litigation lawyers to represent medical providers in seeking prompt payments from insurance companies.  For more information on this topic, please contact Texas Prompt Payment Medical Provider Lawyer Jason Coomer via e-mail or go to the following web page: Texas Prompt Payment for Medical Providers.

Diabetic Thyroid Cancer Health Risk Alert: Byetta Has Recently Been Linked To An Increased Risk of Thyroid Cancer By Diabetic Thyroid Cancer Lawyer

Diabetic Thyroid Cancer Health Risk Alert: Some Diabetes Drugs Have Recently Been Linked To An Increased Risk of Thyroid Cancer By Diabetic Thyroid Cancer Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

In 2012, more than 200,000 people were newly diagnosed with thyroid cancer.  A growing number of people with thyroid cancer are diabetics.  While some diabetic drugs are known to cause an increased risk of thyroid cancer and this increased risk is on the warning label, other diabetic drugs do not have warnings regarding an increased risk of thyroid cancer.  

The diabetes drug, Byetta, currently does not have a warning regarding an increased risk of thyroid cancer, however, some recent studies have suggested that the diabetes drug, Byetta, increases the risk of thyroid cancer.  As such, several Byetta Thyroid Cancer lawsuits are currently being reviewed that allege that the maker of Byetta has failed to provide adequate warnings to consumers and the medical community of this cancer risk resulting in serious injury and death from thyroid cancer.

Individuals that have been diagnosed with thyroid cancer and have taken Byetta as well as families that have lost a loved one to thyroid cancer and that loved one was taking Byetta may be entitled to financial compensation and are strongly encouraged to have their potential case reviewed.  For more information on Byetta Thyroid Cancer Lawsuits, please feel free to contact Byetta Thyroid Cancer Lawyer, Jason Coomer, or use our online submission form.

FDA Adverse Events Have Shown Byetta May Cause An Increased Risk of Thyroid Cancer and Pancreatic Cancer: Persons Taking Byetta That Have Been Diagnosed With Pancreatic Cancer or Thyroid Cancer as well as Their Doctors and Families Are Encouraged To Report Adverse Events To The FDA

 
In July 2011, researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles studied the connection between Byetta and pancreatic cancer, pancreatitis, and thyroid cancer by combing FDA adverse events reports. They calculated a sixfold increase in users developing pancreatitis, and Byetta increased the likelihood of pancreatic cancer by 2.9 times. The lead researcher, Dr. Peter Butler, cautioned that the results do not account for increased Byetta side effects reporting by doctors. The study appeared in the journal of Gastroenterology. 
 

In 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a Drug Safety Communication to announce that drug-makers Amylin Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly Co. must conduct 6 post-marketing surveillance studies to better understand the potential link between Byetta and thyroid cancer. The result of these studies are still pending.

Persons who are taking Byetta and who have been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer or thyroid cancer and their families are strongly encouraged to report adverse events to the FDA to ensure that all cancer risks are properly reviewed and placed on any future Byetta warnings.
 

Byetta Thyroid Cancer Alert: Recent Studies Have Connected Byetta To An Increased Risk of Thyroid Cancer by Byetta Thyroid Cancer Lawyer

Byetta Thyroid Cancer Alert and Byetta Pancreatic Cancer Alert: Recent Scientific Studies Have Connected Byetta To An Increased Risk of Thyroid Cancer and Pancreatic Cancer by Byetta Thyroid Cancer Lawyer and Byetta Pancreatic Cancer Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

Persons taking the injectable diabetes drug, Byetta (Exenatide), should be aware that this diabetes drug may cause an increased risk of thyroid cancer as well as pancreatic cancer.  It is important for any person taking the drug, Byetta, to communicate with their physician to determine the best course of treatment for their diabetes and to make sure that they are aware of any potential cancer symptoms if they continue to take the drug.

If you are taking Byetta and have been diagnosed with thyroid cancer or pancreatic cancer, please feel free to contact Byetta Thyroid Cancer Lawyer and Byetta Pancreatic Cancer Lawyer, Jason S. Coomer about a potential lawsuit. 

Byetta (Exenatide) Has Been Used By Millions of People 

Byetta was the first glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist to be approved by the FDA for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Byetta exhibits many of the same effects as the human incretin hormone GLP-1. GLP-1 improves blood sugar after food intake through multiple effects that work in concert on the stomach, liver, pancreas and brain.  Byetta was approved in the U.S. in April 2005 and in Europe in November 2006 and has been used by more than 1.8 million patients since its introduction. Nearly 7 million prescriptions for Byetta were dispensed between April 2005 and September 2008.  In 2010 Byetta sales were over $500 million.  

The Diabetes Drug Market is Over $40 Billion Each Year and Growing Rapidly Byetta had Annual Sale of Over $500 Million in 2010

More than 300 million people worldwide suffer from diabetes and this number is increasing each year.  This number includes about 26 million Americans who are diabetics.  The global market for products in the management of diabetes currently stands at $41 billion and is on pace to grow to over $114 billion by 2018.


With this huge market for diabetic drugs, many drug producers are pushing drugs with known dangers and are attempting to hide the potential dangers of their drugs to keep or obtain a higher market share.  As such, it is important that persons that have developed cancer from specific drugs or families that have lost loved ones from specific drugs step forward and report dangerous drugs to the FDA as well as file lawsuits to make selling dangerous less profitable.

For more information on potentially dangerous drugs, please go to the following web pages: Byetta Pancreatic Cancer Lawsuits and Byetta Thyroid Cancer Lawsuits and Diabetic Drug Pancreatic Cancer Lawsuits.

Report Hospital Billing Fraud and Collect Large Financial Rewards: Medical Professionals That Properly Report Hospital Billing Fraud Can Collect Large Financial Rewards By Hospital Billing Fraud Lawyer

Report Hospital Billing Fraud and Collect Large Financial Rewards: Medical Professionals That Properly Report Hospital Billing Fraud Can Collect Large Financial Rewards By Hospital Billing Fraud Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

Hospital billing fraud includes upcoding, false coding, false certifications, double billing, phantom patients, unbundling, and illegal kickbacks.  These forms of billing fraud are costing the government billions of dollars and can be the basis of qui tam whistleblower reward lawsuits that offer large financial rewards to medical professions including hospital administrators and other hospital employees that properly expose significant hospital billing fraud.   

For more information on properly reporting hospital billing fraud and having a potential hospital billing fraud case confidentially reviewed, please feel free to contact Hospital Billing Fraud Lawyer, Jason S. Coomer, via e-mail message or go to the following webpage: Report Hospital Billing Fraud and Whistleblower Reward Lawsuit.  

Being the First to File on a Hospital Billing Fraud Scheme is Essential for Recovery Under the False Claims Act

It is essential to not delay in coming forward with a Hospital Billing Fraud Qui Tam Whistleblower Action as the first whistleblower to file is eligible to be a relator and can make a large recovery for exposing the fraud.  Additionally, when the fraudulent scheme is exposed, the people that kept the fraud secret can sometimes be found liable for criminal activity for not exposing the fraud that was being committed.

Hospital Billing Fraud Whistleblower Lawsuits Include Upcoding Qui Tam Whistleblower Lawsuits and Coding Fraud Whistleblower Lawsuits

Upcoding occurs when a medical service provider intentionally and fraudulently upcodes services to obtain a higher reimbursement than one that is entitled to for the service that was actually provided.  In both the Medicare and Medicaid systems a set of billing codes is used by healthcare providers to bill for services. These codes are known as the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS). A service provider that intentionally uses a higher paying code to fraudulently reflect that a more expensive procedure or device was involved in the patient’s treatment than actually was used or was necessary.  A pattern of intentional upcoding treatment can result in large profits for the healthcare provider, but also cost taxpayers millions of dollars.

Upcoding fraud is typically hard to catch without the help of persons with inside information because that Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes are billed electronically and can easily slip through the system.  Therefore unless the upcoding is caught through a random audit (approximately 2% of the claims per year are audited), it is up to insiders, informants, heroes, and health care professionals to catch fraudulent upcoding.

Another type of coding fraud is “unbundling”, where bundled related procedures or composite lab tests are run together, but billed separately by the lab or healthcare provider to obtain more compensation.  These types of billing fraud also allow healthcare providers and labs to make higher profits by bilking Medicare, Medicaid, and taxpayers out of millions of dollars.  These unbundling fraud schemes are also hard to detect without someone that is familiar with the codes and billing.

Hospital Billing Fraud and Other Forms of Health Care Fraud Are Costing The United States and U.S. Taxpayers About $100 Billion Each Year

Law enforcement authorities estimate that health-care fraud costs taxpayers about $100 billion each year.  Through Health Care Fraud Qui Tam Lawsuits billions of dollars have been recovered from individuals and organizations that have committed health care fraud on the United States Government and State Governments. 

HEALTH CARE FRAUD CASE NETS RECOVERY OF $1.7 BILLION 

HCA Inc. (formerly known as Columbia/HCA and HCA - The Healthcare Company) and HCA subsidiaries agreed to pay the United States over $1.7 Billion including $631 million in 2003 for civil penalties and damages arising from false claims the government alleged it submitted to Medicare and other federal health programs. In 2000, HCA subsidiaries pled guilty to substantial criminal conduct and paid more than $840 million in criminal fines, civil restitution and penalties.  HCA will paid an additional $250 million to resolve overpayment claims arising from certain of its cost reporting practices.  In total, the government will have recovered $1.7 billion from HCA.

This Qui Tam settlement resolved fraud allegations against HCA and HCA hospitals in nine False Claims Act qui tam or whistleblower lawsuits pending in federal court in the District of Columbia. Under the federal False Claims Act, private individuals may file suit on behalf of the United States and, if the case is successful, may recover a share of the proceeds for their efforts. Under the HCA settlement, the whistleblowers will receive a combined share of $151,591,500.00.

http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2003/June/03_civ_386.htm

Report Hospice Fraud: Hospice Fraud Whistleblowers Are Needed To Report False Certifications and Other Hospice Fraud by Hospice Fraud Qui Tam Lawyer

Report Hospice Fraud: Hospice Fraud Whistleblowers Are Needed To Report False Certifications and Other Hospice Fraud by Hospice Fraud Qui Tam Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

Large financial rewards are being offered to hospice fraud whistleblowers that are the first to step forward to report large hospice care providers that are committing hospice fraud.  If you are aware of a large hospice care provider or other health care company that is committing hospice fraud, please feel free to contact Hospice Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer, Jason S. Coomer.

For more information on hospice fraud, please read below or go to the following web page: Report Hospice Fraud Information.

Large Hospice Providers in The Unites States Are Receiving Hundreds of Millions of Dollars in Government Benefits and Some Have Been Committing Hospice Fraud

Hospice fraud is on the rise as many large corporations have tried to increase their profits through false certifications, over billing, and other forms of hospice fraud.  Because Medicare, the health program for the elderly and the disabled, automatically pays the vast majority of the bills it receives from companies that possess federally issued supplier numbers, many large companies have learned that hospice fraud is lucrative and is often not detected.

However, there have been several large health care providers that have been made to pay large multimillion dollar fines for hospice fraud lawsuits.  These lawsuits include cases against Odyssey Healthcare Inc. and SouthernCare. There are several other hospice fraud lawsuits that are currently pending and large rewards are being offered to professionals, employees, and other whistleblowers that are the first to be able to expose large scale hospice fraud being committed by a large hospice provider.  Some of the largest hospice providers in the United States include: Vitas, Gentiva, HCR ManorCare, Amedisys, Aseracare, Hospice of the Valley, Compassionate Care Hospice, Seasons Hospice, Hospice Compassus, Southern Care, Providence, Harden Healthcare, Crossroads Hospice, American Hospice, Tidewell Hospice, Hospice of Palm Beach County, Suncoast Hospice, Community Hospice of Northeast, Hope Hospice; Community Services, and Hospice of the Western Reserve.

Hospice Fraud Can Occur When A Hospice Care Provider Falsely Certifies or Recertifies Patients That Are Not Eligible For Hospice Benefits

Hospice Care Providers that practice a pattern of enrolling and recertifying non-terminal patients and billing for continuous care that isn't necessary or reasonable can be committing Hospice Medicare Fraud.  Other Hospice Care Providers that fraudulently maximize the use of Medicare’s hospice benefit by pressuring its employees to enroll people into hospice who aren’t dying and resist discharging them despite evidence they weren’t deteriorating can also be committing Hospice Medicare Fraud that can be the also be the basis of a Hospice Federal False Claims Act Whistleblower Reward Lawsuit.  These Hospice Medicare Fraud Schemes typically have a large health care and hospice provider recruite patients eligible for skilled nursing care for 20 days, for which Medicare pays the entire bill. After the 20 days, when Medicare requires patients pick up a part of the tab, the health care and hospice provider will send the patients to hospice to collect a flat payment from Medicare for each day they are enrolled.  In these fraudulent arrangements a patient will typically be referred and re-referred until that patient has received—and Medicare has been billed for—the maximum number of days of skilled nursing care, including rehabilitative therapy, home health care, and hospice care. 

By being the first to expose a hospice Medicare fraud scheme, a hospice Medicare fraud whistleblower can receive a substantial reward for properly blowing the whistle on fraudulent hospice care providers. 

Hospice Fraud Whistleblowers Can Include Doctors, Nurses, Hospice Employees, or Anyone With Original Knowledge of Hospice Fraud

Hospice fraud whistleblowers are needed to step forward and blow the whistle on large hospice care providers that are committing hospice fraud.  If you are aware of a large hospice care provider or other health care company that is commiting hospice fraud, please feel free to contact Hospice Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer, Jason S. Coomer.  

Texas Animal Attack Lawyer and Texas Child Dog Bite Lawyer: Uncontrolled Vicious Dogs and Dangerous Animals Can Seriously Injure and Kill Children, Women, and Elderly Persons by Texas Fatal Animal Attack Lawyer and Texas Child Dog Bite Lawyer

Texas Fatal Animal Attack Lawyer and Texas Child Dog Bite Lawyer: Vicious Dog and Dangerous Animal Attacks Can Result When Careless Owners Fail to Protect Neighbors, Children, and Invitees from Being Attacked From Dangerous Animals by Texas Fatal Animal Attack Lawyer and Texas Child Dog Bite Lawyer

Vicious dogs and dangerous animals can cause serious injuries or even death when not properly restrained.  Property owners that keep dangerous animals and fail to properly restrain their animals can often be help liable when their animal attacks and seriously injures or kills a neighbor, invitee, or child.

It is estimated that there are over 4 million dog attacks each year.  Of these animal attacks, some of them are vicious animal attacks that kill or seriously injure children or groups of dangerous animals that hunt or attack an adult or elderly person.  These attacks can leave a child or adult permanently scarred and injured for life or result in death.  Though children and elderly people are typically the most vulnerable to attacks by vicious dogs, multiple dogs or unexpected attacks can injure anyone and cause serious injury or death.

Though dogs are the most common animal that attacks and causes serious injuries, other animals can also attack causing serious injuries or death.  Owners of these potentially dangerous or deadly animals are required to take reasonable care of their animals to make sure that they are not able to get free to attack neighbors or attack invited visitors.  When a landowner is careless and allows an animal to attack someone and should have been aware of the potential danger of their animal, the owner can often be held liable for the attack and any serious injuries or fatal injuries that the animal attack caused.

For more information on this topic, please read below or follow the below links:  Texas Animal Attack Death Lawyer and Texas Dog Bite Lawyer or Austin Texas Fatal Animal Attack Lawyer and Austin Texas Child Dog Bite Lawyer.

 

Austin Texas Dog Bite Lawsuits, Austin Dog Attack Lawsuits, and Austin Animal Attack Lawsuits

Unfortunately, some people fail to train or keep control of their animals.  Even worse some people train their Pit Bulls, Chows, Rottweilers, and other dangerous or vicious dogs to be attack dogs.  When these untrained and attack dogs attacks a child or neighbor, the injuries can be severe or deadly. 

The City of Austin has special laws in place that require owners of dogs to keep the dogs leased, unless the dog is in a specially designated area.  If the owner fails to keep track of their dog and that dog attacks someone, the own can often be found liable for the injuries that the dog causes.

In being an Austin Texas Dog Attack Injury attorney, I have been fortunate enough to represent some really good people that had been injured by dog attacks.  Helping these people obtain compensation for significant medical expenses, impairment, disfigurement, pain & suffering, and future medical, is a big part of being a lawyer and helping people recover from a vicious attack.

As an Austin Personal Injury Lawyer, Jason Coomer has worked on a wide variety of cases including several wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases.  He commonly works with other excellent lawyers including Dallas Personal Injury Lawyers, Houston Animal Attack Lawyers, San Antonio Dog Attack Lawyers, and Austin Canine Attack Lawyers.  Assembling litigation teams of Texas Wrongful Death and Personal Injury Lawyers for the larger cases and building multimedia presentations for mediation, arbitration, hearings, and trial can be time consuming, but when you are dealing with someone's life and the devastation that can be caused by a serious injury, a vicious animal attack, or loss of a loved one, the effort is worth it.  Individualized attention to a Texas Animal Attack Claim is extremely important.  Make sure that you have a Texas Dog Attack Attorney that knows your name and is familiar with your death claim or personal injury claims as well as your wants and needs.

If you have been seriously injured or have lost a loved one through the wrongful actions of a land owner with vicious dogs or other dangerous animals, please feel free to contact Austin Dog Bite Lawyer, Jason Coomer, with your name, date of accident, location of accident, nature of the injuries or loss, and name of the potential defendant for a free review of your potential claim.
 

Texas Family Business Inheritance Lawyer: Texas Family Business Inheritance Can Often Be Lost Through Improper Estate Planning and The Probate Process by Texas Family Business Inheritance Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

Texas Family Business Inheritance Lawyer and Texas Real Estate Inheritance Lawyer: Texas Family Business Inheritance and Texas Real Property Inheritance Can Often Be Lost Through Improper Estate Planning, Lack of Communication, Lack of Resources, and Failure To Understand The Texas Probate Legal System by Texas Family Business Inheritance Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

Some Texas families have been able to build successful businesses, obtain large real estate holdings including mineral interests, and accumulate significant wealth.  However, many of these wealthy Texas families will lose this wealth through inaction, failure to communicate essential business information, and failure to understand Texas probate and inheritance issues.  

As a Texas Family Business Inheritance Lawyer and Texas Real Estate Inheritance Lawyer, Jason Coomer works with family members throughout the World to protect, claim, and transfer wealth including family businesses, family farms, and family mineral interests.  For questions regarding Texas probate and inheritance law, protecting family businesses or property through probate, claiming family wealth, and clearing title to real estate after a death, please feel free to send an e-mail message to Texas Family Business Inheritance Lawyer Jason S. Coomer or use our contact form to submit an inquiry regarding a Texas Real Estate Inheritance or Texas Family Business Inheritance Matter. 

Many Situations Can Cause Texas Inherited Real Property and Texas Family Business Inheritance To Become Trapped After The Death of a Family Member: Failure To Clear Title To Texas Inherited Real Property and Texas Family Businesses Can Result In The Loss Of Family Wealth

 

After a family member dies, their real property or business can become stuck in the inheritance process and if proper action is not taken it can be lost to foreclosure, taxes, competitors, non-family members, or the State of Texas .  These situations are especially common when the person dies without a Will, leaves no instructions as to what they want done with their possessions after they die, and/or has no accurate inventory or accounting of their wealth.  In these situations, Texas real property and Texas businesses will need to be transferred under Texas intestate law.  As such, it is important to understand what Texas intestate law says on how the estate should be divided and how title to the real estate and ownership of the business can be transferred.

In addition to the issue of intestate succession, there are also a number of other common situations that can cause inherited real property and businesses to become stuck.  The first situation occurs when the family is unable to move forward with the probate process because of lack of resources.  The second situation occurs when the family is unable to move forward with probate because of proximity issues.  In other words, the heirs do not live in Texas or close to where their loved one died.  In a third situation, family members can start fighting over their loved one's estate.  In a forth situation, there is not sufficient information to know the amount of or location of wealth that needs to be transferred.  In other words, the family member that died or become incompetent did not do sufficient estate planning or communicate with their family members regarding their wealth.   In all these situations, Texas real estate and businesses can become stuck for years or can even be lost.

 

Clearing Title To and Transferring Texas Real Property and Texas Businesses Through Probate Usually Requires The Services of One or More Texas Family Business Inheritance Lawyers

Depending on the reason that caused Texas inherited property or a family business to become stuck in the probate process, the solution may be hiring a Texas family business inheritance lawyer or a Texas real estate inheritance lawyer.  In the situation where the surviving family cannot afford the probate process, a Texas real estate inheritance lawyer or Texas family business inheritance lawyer can sometimes work out a contingent contract or a hybrid contract where the lawyer will work to clear title to the Texas real property or family business so it can be sold or mortgaged allowing the heirs, beneficiaries, court costs, attorney's fees, and other expenses to be paid out of the sales proceeds of the real property or business.  In these situations, families can often prevent losing inherited wealth through foreclosure or taxes.

 

In the situation where the family lives outside of the State of Texas, a Texas real estate inheritance attorney can often be appointed the local agent for the administrator or executive and help with many of the tasks that need to be handled in administering the estate.  This can greatly limit the need for the family to make numerous trips to Texas or the county where their loved one died and allow a busy family member to handle probate issues without a significant drain on their time.

 

In situations where the heirs and beneficiaries start fighting, it is often necessary for multiple Texas real estate inheritance lawyers to become involved.  In these situations, it is typically best for each side to have their own legal counsel to advise them as to their rights under Texas law and if necessary to have legal counsel that can advocate for their rights.  These contested probate lawsuits can be expensive, but can be necessary when someone is attempting to steal family inheritance or the family needs experienced legal help to settle a disputed probate matter and prevent the loss of inherited real estate in Texas. 

 

Texas Family Business Inheritance Lawyer and Texas Real Estate Inheritance Lawyer

 

For more information regarding Texas probate and inheritance law, claiming family wealth, and clearing title to real estate after the death of a family member, please feel free to send an e-mail message to Texas Family Business Inheritance Lawyer Jason S. Coomer or use our contact form to submit an inquiry regarding a Texas Real Estate Inheritance or Texas Family Business Inheritance Matter. 

 

Rewards for Exposing False Books and Accounting Records: Ex-JPMorgan Chase Employees Charged Over 'London Whale' Scandal

SEC Bounty Action Whistleblowers Can Receive Large Rewards for Exposing False Books and Records, Wire Fraud, and False Regulatory Filings

Persons with evidence of false accounting records, securities fraud, insider trading, false information on SEC filings, insider trading; stock manipulation schemes, embezzlement by stockbrokers, or other securities fraud schemes, should contact a SEC Whistleblower lawyer to have their potential Bounty Action confidentially reviewed.

SEC Bounty Action Whistleblowers can work through a SEC Whistleblower Reward Lawyer to have a potential bounty action confidentially reviewed prior to exposing their identity.  This protection of a whistleblower's identity combined with large potential rewards that a whistleblower may receive for properly exposing SEC violations are intended to encourage high end financial professionals and investors to step forward and expose significant securities and investment fraud schemes.
   
Ex-JPMorgan Chase Employees Charged Over 'London Whale' Scandal

U.S. prosecutors have charged two former JPMorgan Chase employees, Javier Martin-Artajo and Julien Grout, for their role in the "London Whale" scandal.

The charges are a milestone in the government's response to what has been an embarrassing and costly episode for the biggest U.S. bank, which still faces the prospect of civil penalties. But it once again places the heaviest legal burden on players fairly low in the bank's hierarchy.

In criminal complaints unsealed on Wednesday morning, the Federal Bureau of Investigation accused Martin-Artajo and Grout of falsifying books and records, wire fraud and falsifying regulatory filings about bad trades in credit derivatives last year that cost JPMorgan more than $6.2 billion in losses. The FBI said it wants to arrest both men, who were also charged with conspiracy. Arrests could be challenging, as both are in Europe and out of the reach of U.S. law enforcement at the moment.

Separately, the Justice Department said another former JPMorgan employee, Bruno Iksil, known as the London Whale, had entered a "non-prosecution cooperation agreement." The government agreed not to prosecute Iksil as long as he cooperates and testifies truthfully about the trades and the alleged cover-up. Iksil has been helping the government build its case against other former JPMorgan employees, the Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday.

SEC Fraud Whistleblower Bounty Actions Are Designed to Expose Significant SEC Violations and Provide Large Financial Rewards For People That Are The Original Source of Information That Expose The Fraud Against The SEC

SEC Fraud Whistleblower Lawsuits or SEC Bounty Actions are a product of the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.  These laws were designed to create bounties that can be collected by whistleblowers that properly report SEC violations, financial fraud, securities fraud, commodities fraud, and stimulus fraud that result in monetary sanctions over one million dollars ($1,000,000.00).  The SEC can award the whistleblower up to 30% of the money collected.

By creating whistleblower bounties for investors and people with specific information of fraud, it is expected that hard to detect fraud will be exposed to help regulate the financial market and prevent large investment corporations, banks, hedge funds, and other large corporations from committing financial fraud of billions of dollars.

For more information on this topic, please go to the following web page: SEC Whistleblowers Receive Rewards for Exposing False Books and Accounting Records.